Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pelican sequence
I was at the sea, and of course there were pelicans. Took a seqence of the bird coming out of the water (the photos aren't all from the same position in case you are wondering) and was fortunate enough to capture his little 'shout'.
- Support. Self Nom.--Fir0002 05:27, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Cute! --Barfooz 06:09, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Come on Fir, you've done much better. -- Solipsist 07:49, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Hmm not sure, for some reason does not strike me, maybe just a bit dull and colorless. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 08:46, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. I do like the 2nd and 3rd pelican, but not the dull background. Moreover I do not see an additional value in using a sequence here. Janderk 11:56, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. None of the singular images are striking, and there's not enough synergy in the collection to compensate. - [[User:Bevo|Bevo]] 23:59, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. I usually don't like series pictures, but i like this one :-). --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 03:54, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Images aren't great on their own, and the sequence isn't particularly enlightening. ed g2s • talk 14:45, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Wikipedia takes itself too seriously sometimes, and there's some symbolism here we may be able to grasp if we try hard enough. Matthewcieplak 01:53, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 03:07, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not striking. Mark1 01:30, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. So cute! —Lowellian (talk)[[]] 23:52, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
- I would suppose the last picture (mouth-opened) only if it's large enough to be clear and detailed. But as of now, it's low quality. I'm not very impressed by the first two pictures. --Menchi 08:15, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)