Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pincushion hakea
Nice flower, and nice photo.
- Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 11:18, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sorry Fir, but it makes me go a bit crosseyed. --Silversmith Hewwo 12:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support. My eyes are fine. --brian0918™ 13:03, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it's true that I don't have my glasses on...:p But there's more to my oppose than that. --Silversmith Hewwo 13:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - background too fussy - Adrian Pingstone 16:28, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC
- Support, nice, and the background does tend to go fuzzy in pictures sometimes, but in this case I think it draws more toward the flower. Phoenix2 03:14, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support I like it. This link is Broken 03:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support, very good flower photo -- Chris 73 Talk 09:19, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - My eyes are fine too, ummm but no... I oppose it --Oblivious 14:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. I've got my glasses on, but I think the colour is a little dull/lacking something. Enochlau 06:05, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Nice photo. - Darwinek 15:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)- Support, nice photo.-gadfium 30 June 2005 03:21 (UTC)
- Neutral. I can't make my mind up about this one. Its a good picture of an exotic looking flower, but it isn't illustrating any articles particularly well. A bit like the Osteospermum flower, it really needs an article on the plant itself. I'd like to know why the styles are so long, but judging from this page its a popular reproductive strategy in Western Australia. -- Solipsist 1 July 2005 08:24 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo -- WB July 8, 2005 07:46 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Pincushion hakea03.jpg +8 / -4 / 1 neutral -- Solipsist 9 July 2005 08:14 (UTC)