Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pomegranate

Version 2

A good photo as well as being informative. I will understand if you oppose on the grounds that it has been faked in photoshop (compare the original)

Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 June 28, 2005 10:47 (UTC)
I don't mind the photoshopping, but only the stuff in the foreground is clear, which I don't think is acceptable. --Spangineer (háblame) June 28, 2005 12:15 (UTC)
- Object because much of the pomegranate is out of focus. --Spangineer (háblame) July 1, 2005 03:10 (UTC)
All of the pomegranate should be in focus. File:PhoenixSuns 100.pngPhoenix2 28 June 2005 17:56 (UTC)
- IMO it's not possible... Ericd 3 July 2005 20:19 (UTC)
- Support, the picture is high quality, even with the pomegranate in the "background" slightly out of focus. File:PhoenixSuns 100.pngPhoenix2 30 June 2005 19:54 (UTC)
The only part that's jarringly out of focus to my eye is the one seed lying on the table. I've taken the liberty of editing it out (Version 2). --Cryptic (talk) 29 June 2005 20:21 (UTC)
- Support either version. --Cryptic (talk) 30 June 2005 20:31 (UTC)
- Support (version 2) It would be better if everything was in sharp focus but it's still a good pic. G-Man 1 July 2005 19:22 (UTC)
Support either. The focus is fine. Enochlau 2 July 2005 08:12 (UTC)
Support. James F. (talk) 2 July 2005 10:56 (UTC)
Support version 2 - Sango 123 July 2, 2005 16:04 (UTC)
Support either version -- Chris 73 Talk July 5, 2005 05:57 (UTC)
Support either version -- Shivu 08:25, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Promoted Image:Pomegranate03 edit.jpg (apparent preference for version 2) -- Enochlau 13:56, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]