Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Software engineering
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2013 at 08:08:59 (UTC)
- Reason
- Good quality image with good EV.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Software engineering, Software, Software engineer, and many articles through Template:Software development process including articles such as Computer programming, Agile software development, and User experience design
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Others
- Creator
- Matthew Roth, Matthew (WMF)
- Support as nominator --Pine✉ 08:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. I would love it if we had more occupational portraits, but I do think they should show the worker's face; this one is a portrait of a computer screen, which actually doesn't illustrate software engineering very well, since that is something done by people. File:HH Polizeihauptmeister MZ.jpg and File:Arborists-3,-Kallista,-VIC,-09.07.2008.jpg are both good models for this kind of picture, particularly the arborist one, which is a favorite of mine. Chick Bowen 15:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- strong oppose First the framing is too tight for me. I'm rather concerned to see this picture as infobox image of articles such as Scrum (development) because it doesn't not illustrate this agile method (nor it illustrates Agile software development). It shows an OOF developper with it's two screens, a wiki (what he is working on) and a JS editor. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support The worker's face is totally unimportant. It is what he does which matters. Software engineers mostly sit in front of a computer and work on the source of computer programs. So that sense this photo is quite representative in my view. JJ Harrison (talk) 03:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is an unremarkable photo without any inherent message. The cropping is too tight and the back of the individual occupies too much space. I would agree with JJ Harrison if the shot was back perhaps 10 feet. While the image may very well depict software engineering, it does add to the knowledge of the viewer. User:Ludwig Wise 15:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LudwigHW (talk • contribs)
- Oppose per above. Framing is too tight. Jujutacular (talk) 19:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ludwig. I really wonder what about this image led someone to nominate here. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 09:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)