Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Squilla mantis for sale

Squilla mantis for sale

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2010 at 14:24:50 (UTC)

Original - Squilla mantis for sale at a Catalonian market. S. mantis is the only native stomatopod to be fished for on a commercial scale in the Mediterranean. Over 7,000 t is caught annually, 85% of which is caught on Italian shores of the Adriatic Sea, with further production in the Ionian Sea, off Sardinia, off the coast of Catalonia and off the Balearic Islands. It is mostly taken as by-catch of other fisheries (including for sole), and commercial interest derives from the species' abundance rather than its market value.

Brighter edit 1

Without loss of highlights edit 2

Reason: Something a little different. Potentially very eye-catching (perhaps depending on whether this is something you see often- it really drew my eye), high quality and a good size. Really hits home the fact that the "commercial interest derives from the species' abundance rather than its market value". Caption copied from the image page/article.
Articles in which this image appears: Squilla mantis, list of types of seafood
FP category for this image: Crustaceans (possibly Lifestyle)
Creator: Hans Hillewaert

Support as nominator --J Milburn (talk) 14:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking forward to new whitebalance theories, intuitions and speculations... --Dschwen 14:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Didn't think I'd like this, but I was impressed. Not giving it full support because it's a bit dark and, honestly, kind of miscellaneous, a bit like this. --I'ḏ♥One 16:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I nominated it because it's "kind of miscellaneous"- people get bored of the same kind of thing. So far as I see it, this is eye-catching and different to our usual nominations while retaining a high EV. Very difficult balancing act at the moment, it seems. J Milburn (talk) 00:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sea bugs aren’t pretty. Sure, they aren’t supposed to be, but this picture is too dark; way too dark. The overall result is I don’t think this will elicit a “stop, stare & click”-reaction from our visiting I.P. readership. Where’s the awe? Where’s the “Hmmm… interesting?” I think they’ll react with “Hmmm… an under-exposed picture of hard-shell maggots,” and then go type “Lady gaga” in the Google search field. Greg L (talk) 16:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Respectfully, I disagree. Have you never seen someone staring with morbid curiosity at the fish counter in ~~Tesco~~ Walmart? Have you never seen how fish markets are always included in tourist information books? I think sea food is especially "interesting" to many; and seeing the "real" side of food often surprises people- to quote a 14 year old my father knew- "eurgh, you can eat SHEEP!?" J Milburn (talk) 19:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I see what you mean. Like booger-flavored Jelly Belly jelly beans. I suppose I could get behind that. I’d vote “support” if the brightness if fixed here so the image quality is first class. I had earlier downloaded this image and played with it. There is tons of histogram room to do better (and remember, those specular reflections can pack as a small spike on the right-hand edge). Alas, I threw that one away. So I did it all over again and uploaded a brighter suggestion. I’ll let you endorse this one or suggest a brighter one of your own before re-voting. If you don’t like mine, just write over it so we don’t have three of them being voted on here; that just lessens the chances of arriving at a winning consensus on something. Greg L (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'd be inclined to say that your edit has gone far too far. I don't really see how it is an improvement, if I'm honest. J Milburn (talk) 00:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - Greg L has a preference for totally overblown highlights. Perhaps a vision problem. --jjron (talk) 07:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        Or just maybe monitor needs to be calibrated? Noodle snacks (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit Looks right, could we add it to Seafood or something perhaps? Noodle snacks (talk) 04:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added it to list of types of seafood, which was very under-illustrated. J Milburn (talk) 15:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit upstate NYer 03:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2 Like edit 1, but keeps the highlights. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 09:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I also prefer edit 2. J Milburn (talk) 12:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2. Greg L (talk) 16:29, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2 Very interesting collection of sea bugs. Not sure I'd be brave enough to eat one of these things, although they're supposed to taste good like lobster. — raeky T 15:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't eat meat, but it's prawns and shrimps I miss the most. God knows why. J Milburn (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edit 2. Cool photo, quite interesting. Not too high on the EV scale, but acceptable. Kaldari (talk) 20:42, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Squilla mantis (l'Ametlla) brighter and quality.jpg —Maedin\^talk 14:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]