Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Swan

Mute Swan

Reason: I like the swans position.
Articles this image appears in: Swan
Creator: Oliver Nimz
Nominator: Bewareofdog

Support — Bewareofdog 05:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Doesn't meet size requirements (868x577px). --Tewy 05:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Size requirement not met. Dan M 05:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Also blown highlights and mediocre composition. It's been quiet in FPC haven't it... --antilived^{T | C | G} 12:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It has indeed been quiet...anyway, this image clearly doesn't meet requirements. Bewareofdog, you really should go over the requirements for FP and reassess the images you've been nominating. Almost to the image they've been undeserving and in large volume, which is fine I guess (especially because it HAS been so quiet) but it will do you and the project a service if you look for the truly excellent images. --Iriseyes 14:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - far too small, blown highlights, and 'I like the swans position' is not a valid reason for a picture becoming featured. Please read the featured picture criteria before nominating - a lot of your recently nominated images fail at least one point on the criteria and as such are, to be quite honest, a waste of both our time and yours. I'm not being angry, it's just a piece of advice that I think you need. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 18:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for size. Trebor 19:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Inadequate resolution and uninteresting composition. Nice pose by the bird though. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 20:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose must have been a beautiful sight but the image is clearly below the size requirements. Arjun 21:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, besides being below size requirements, that doesn't seem like a pretty good reason to nominate this for Featured Picture. Sorry. --Tohru Honda13^{Talk•Sign here} 04:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The highlights are blown, and it is too small. NauticaShad e s 11:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Minor Oppose; the only problem I have is with the picture size...and not everyone has that much time to come to FPC, you know. As it already is, I should be doing my revision... -- Alt iris Exeunt 11:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per size, which is a shame because it's a great picture. Jorcoga Yell! 13:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --KFP (talk | contribs) 13:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]