Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tiger2
- Reason
- Well-focused, good-quality, important subject
- Articles this image appears in
- Tiger
- Creator
- Meldshal42
- Support as nominator --Meldshal42Hit meWhat I've Done 23:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose A nice snapshot, but lacks the clarity of an FP. Also, doesn't show much of the animal and there's a lot of dead space in the pic. Matt Deres (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - Snapshot indeed. 8thstar 00:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Snapshot, poor exposure and comp 58.6.95.145 (talk) 03:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Anonymous (IPs) do not get 'votes'. Sorry. crassic![talk] 03:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per Matt Deres. crassic![talk] 03:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose As Matt Deres points out, it lacks the clarity of an FP. SpencerT♦C 03:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The main issues are the blurriness and the less-than-optimal shooting angle. --Bowlhover (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . --John254 01:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)