Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tutufa bufo shell

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2011 at 09:19:25 (UTC)

Original - Tutufa bufo shell

Reason: Featured on Commons, high quality, good EV, used in other national Wiki.
Articles in which this image appears: Tutufa bufo, Tutufa
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Others
Creator: George Chernilevsky

Support as nominator --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. High quality, encyclopedic. NauticaShad es 17:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd add that I think the lighting issues are minimal here, and don't overly detract from the EV. NauticaShad es 11:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Size reference, or scale, or description of the size on the image page would be helpful. Spikebrennan (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose uneven lighting in comparison of both samples. Jó Kritika (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A bit hasty with the photoshopping? The lefthand shell is horrifically cut out. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The lighting leaves quite a bit to be desired. JJ Harrison (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close??? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy closes cause too much controversy. They only happen when the uploader requests a withdrawal. J Milburn (talk) 02:28, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, you should only invoke speedy close if there is absolutely no question that everyone is going to oppose. However, Nautica above clearly supports it; so speedy close is especially inapposite. Purpy Pupple (talk) 02:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, i agree with speedy close and withdraw this nomination. Thanks to all for review --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]