Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Walter Reed Hospital

The Walter Reed General Hospital in September, 1919. The WRGH was the precursor to the current Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

Reason: Amazing historical value, widescreen from 1919. Adds great value to the article it is in. Restored version of original by Mfield, originally nominated version that is discussed is here
Articles this image appears in: Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Creator: Balcer

Support as nominator --Mastrchf (^t/_c) 16:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose compare it to the original - the restoration was OK up until the point that the sky got overdarked, bringing out a lot of grain and splots. I would probably support a better restoration, in fact I'll probably do it if I get a moment. Also, is this really the highest resolution that is available - 588 seems like a low vertical dimension from what was presumably a fair sized set of prints - that makes the prints less than 2" high at 300dpi which seems unlikely - if the prints were larger they were scanned at too low a resolution. Shame. Mfield (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The earliest version of the image here looks much better, although it has the split. And that's be great if you could do a better restoration of the image. Mastrchf (^t/_c) 17:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I reworked the file from the original and uploaded it over the top as there were no votes yet except mine and the nominator who agreed on a new rework. The weak part of the support is per my original comments about the lack of resolution. Mfield (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support. Being unfamiliar with the site, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt, and assume that it wasn't possible to obtain a photograph that would have had all the buildings in frame. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 17:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image doesn't do it for me. Just being old and panoramic doesn't necessarily make it a FP, and to be honest, it makes me kind of dizzy. smooth0⁷0₇ (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose It looks nice, but it doesn't seem to illustrate the nature of Walter Reed, the appearance or work done there.Becky Sayles (talk) 00:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
oppose per smooth.Dwayne Reed (talk) 18:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 06:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]