Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Music of Australia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a promoted featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it.
Most of the issues from the old FPOC have been dealt with. There just isn't enough news in this genre to justify a news box, but otherwise I think it has everything needed. Let's do this! — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 03:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Old issues in previous nominations are fixed. (Optional) Try find something other than contemptory music. OhanaUnitedTalk page 08:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak support I think I discussed this with DHMO once before too... I think the portal has a strongly rock slant. Very little focus is given to the growing and quite popular Australian hip-hop scene, and almost none to the ancient tradition of Aboriginal music. I realise that this is perhaps because these are fringe areas to work with on WP. So, for scope of material, I'm not sure this portal hits my buttons - in all other areas, it's great. ~ Riana ⁂ 09:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In my defense, I know nothing about Hip hop or Aboriginal music - I invite anyone who does to contribute content =/ — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 09:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh noes... Powderfinger-cruft! I see seven instances of that band in the portal; a bit too much considering it's only one band. Mind tuning it down a little? --DarkFalls talk 23:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done (per IRC discussion) - DYK randomised. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 05:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as the issue has been addressed... --DarkFalls talk 07:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh noes... Powderfinger-cruft! I see seven instances of that band in the portal; a bit too much considering it's only one band. Mind tuning it down a little? --DarkFalls talk 23:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In my defense, I know nothing about Hip hop or Aboriginal music - I invite anyone who does to contribute content =/ — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 09:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support although ensuring that the scope is broad and balanced, per Riana, should be improved. Daniel 11:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- In "Selected article", the "More selected articles..." could instead say "Archives".
- In "Did you know", "See more" could simply be "More...", I am noticing a lack of uniformity in this throughout each section.
- Same with "Selected picture", the "More selected pictures", could instead say "Archives" or "Archive/Nominations".
- Could use a nice icon in the upper right of sections "Things you can do" and "Wikiprojects" and "Categories".
- I added what I think you were referring to in the to-do and wikiprojects ones, but I can't think of anything for the categories page. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 22:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Missing an Associated Wikimedia section.
- Except on Commons, there is no associated Wikimedia on this topic. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 22:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cirt (talk) 21:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Support - Per the changes addressed with regards to my points from above. Thanks so much, that was quick. Good work! Cirt (talk) 23:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment: Good job. I'll try to use Richard's design and review checklist.
- Introduction: Nice logo.
- Naturally, I didn't make it...lincalinca (talk · contribs) did. And thanks :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 01:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pictures:
- The later selected pictures' text should be left justified like the first several's, instead of being centered.
- Ended up centering everything. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 01:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In the first selected picture, People playing the didgeridoo → Didgeridoo players
- This picture seems a little blurry. Maybe it could be resized a bit?
- That's just how the image is. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 23:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I was thinking that reducing the width to
200px
would reduce the blurriness. Your call — [sd] 14:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Done. [sd] 01:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I was thinking that reducing the width to
- DYK: More... → Archives...
- To-do: More tasks… → More... for uniformity with the other boxes.
- Header and Footer: The header browsebar could be put into the table like the footer currently is.
- Overall:
- A space after Show new selected content... would be good.
- I tried this and it looked icky...you're welcome to give it a shot. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 01:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Y Done — [sd] 14:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I would suggest italicizing all box titles (excluding the introduction). Cheers, [sd] 22:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done - the major topics and intro ones aren't, everything in columns is. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 01:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Thanks for addressing my comments! [sd] 01:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Great portal, good work. Rt. 12:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 supports, 1 week, all criteria and suggestions completed within a sufficient time period. Promoted. Rt. 16:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.