Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:World War II

The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The portal was promoted by User:Rudget 09:20, 5 July 2008 [1].

Portal:World War II

previous FPOC In my opinion this portal displays the best Wikipedia has to offer.21 featured articles,32 selected pictures ,10 selected biographies,13 articles for Selected equipment , and 18 selected battles.All of the articles and images are featured . Bewareofdog 21:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good, averything appears to be in order. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Was a very good portal before last process, is a better one this time. Surpasses criteria. Lots of room to add even more FA stuff, especially bios. What might draw critique is the quantity of redlinks in the task force announcements template. When addressing this issue on P:ACW FP process, I farmed the bios out to a list of requested ones and linked that. If this redlink issue becomes a deal breaker (and IMHO it shouldn't be), you could also create a "requested engagements" sublist and move a bunch of links there. Good work! BusterD (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice and clean. Very well done. Only comment I have is the same as last time (which was answered then, thanks: some military portals have a different menu at the top, and although I think all the portals would use the same menu, that difference has been explained). Congratulations in advance, and good luck with maintenance. —SusanLesch (talk) 07:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good work on this portal; looks really nice and organized. It seems to pass all of the criteria. Hello32020 (talk) 02:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A fabulously constructed portal that exceeds the criteria for FP-Status. Cam (Chat) 06:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

Promoted. Rudget (logs) 09:17, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.