Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Featured log/January 2016

Good topic candidates: view - edit - history

2015 Vuelta a España

2015 Vuelta a España

4 articles

List of teams and cyclists

Stage 1 to Stage 10

Stage 11 to Stage 21

Contributor(s): User:Relentlessly

The main article has recently been promoted to featured status; the two sub-articles are GAs and the last article is a FL. I wrote almost all of all four articles and I believe they are consistent. My only question is whether the appropriate image is the map or one like File:Fabio Aru Red Jersey - Vuelta a España 2015.JPG, which shows Fabio Aru in the red jersey of the race winner. --Relentlessly (talk) 08:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

• Support I was GA reviewer to all three of the GAs and absolutely support this nomination. I would also like to once again thank Relentlessly for their great work! Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
• Support fantastic work on getting all these articles up to the required standard. Regarding the image, I'm not sure myself, I think it's a matter of taste. I have no issues with the map, anyway. NapHit (talk) 17:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

• I think the articles should have bee 1-10 and 11-21. Nergaal (talk) 05:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Hi Nergaal. Sorry for being so long in replying. I agree, as I've said elsewhere, so I've been bold and moved them. I think I've adjusted all the necessary links. Let me know what you think. Relentlessly (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
    • @Relentlessly: I think that should either be reverted or applied to all stage articles from 2006 to 2014. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
      • Why, Armbrust? It's the obvious distinction in this race, but not necessarily so in other years. Relentlessly (talk) 12:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
        • For consistency. Before you changed it all were divided as 1-11 and 12-21. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
          • Which was and remains entirely arbitrary. For me, logical division in this set of articles is more important than consistency with a set of historical articles. I'm very happy to go and have a look at whether other articles would be better divided differently at a later point. Relentlessly (talk) 14:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
• Support - nice getting this all done so quickly. I think this could be a good model for Wikipedia in the future. Get major articles as good as possible as quickly as possible (especially while the interest is there) so it can be a good/featured topic ASAP, and so there isn't as much work in the future. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
• Closed with a consensus to promote to Featured Topic. - GamerPro64 01:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

1928 Atlantic hurricane season

1928 Atlantic hurricane season

4 articles

Fort Pierce hurricane

Haiti hurricane

Okeechobee hurricane

Contributor(s): Cyclonebiskit (nominator), 12george1, CapeVerdeWave, Hurricanehink, TheAustinMan

All known tropical cyclones—as documented by the Atlantic hurricane database—are covered within the recently promoted main article. The three most damaging storms have their own articles to cover information more in-depth. Previously, the 1928 Okeechobee hurricane had questionable FA-status, but recent expansions by CapeVerdeWave have eased my concerns. --~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 23:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Support - Nice to see some of the older ones getting attention. --PresN 01:50, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Director comment - Gonna need more discussion here before we get a consensus. GamerPro64 02:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Support for promotion as it looks complete to me. -- Frankie _talk 08:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Support very well detailed articles Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

• Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic.--十八 06:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)