Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/1995 Quebec referendum/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted per general consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
I am listing this article for GAR because of uncited paragraphs throughout the article. I listed this for an individual assessment in Oct. and the article went through subsequent improvements, although work seems to have stalled. There was disagreement in the individual GAR about if the article met the GA criteria, which is why I am seeking further comments with a community assessment. Z1720 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delist the problem of content whose source is unclear is still present in the article. (t · c) buidhe 21:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delist many cn tags. No distinction between further reading / potential general references. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.