Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Beholder (horse)/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
The "Breeding career" section is unsourced and reads like a list because there are multiple one-sentence paragraphs. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article as "Backgound" and "Breeding career" information is missing. Z1720 (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like scads of cruft has been added since the GAN.[1] Will do a simple revert for now. Montanabw(talk) 18:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Follow up did some extensive cleanup to remove the fancruft. Look better now? Montanabw(talk) 18:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC).
- @Montanabw: It looks much better. Was any of the removed information important information to keep for completeness? Z1720 (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also, is there any post-2016 information to add to the article? Z1720 (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I took all the breeding history stuff and consolidated what was actually notable — with sources — into the section I renamed “honors and legacy”. I also added the 2022 Hall of Fame indiction there, in the lede and in the infobox.Let me know if that works. Montanabw(talk) 03:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Concerns have been addressed and resolved. Z1720 (talk) 15:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I took all the breeding history stuff and consolidated what was actually notable — with sources — into the section I renamed “honors and legacy”. I also added the 2022 Hall of Fame indiction there, in the lede and in the infobox.Let me know if that works. Montanabw(talk) 03:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)