Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Beth Phoenix/1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many uncited passages and an orange "citations needed" banner on top of the "Other media" section. This is a BLP. Z1720 (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delist, due to uncited statements. I did wonder if simply removing the uncited statements would resolve the problem, but it's a good few years since this became a GA, and it looks like there is quite a lot that has happened since then that should be covered in the article. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.