Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Civil War token/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted. Real4jyy (talk) 03:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
2007 GA with some uncited sections, such as the rarity scale. My biggest concern however is the breadth; this is an entire area of numismatic study with quite a large number of books, and this article is citing none of them (only books cited are a general guide book and a book on civil war cards.) It's mainly cited to grading company websites which are usually tertiary. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist on breadth and sourcing grounds per nominator. Although I will note that since Civil War store cards are a subset of Civil War tokens, the use of a book about store cards is relevant and not unexpected; it isn't referring to "cards" as we would expect the definition to normally be. Hog Farm Talk 16:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.