The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Keep Procedural close, editor actually wants peer review. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
This article became a good article in 2007. I have recently expanded the article significantly, but I would like to know if it was for the better, and how I can improve it further. FunkMonk (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, this page is for reassessing articles that clearly do not meet the GA criteria. If you want comments then list it at WP:Peer review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry, and thanks! FunkMonk (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.