Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hazel Miner/1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No action. The article has been rereviewed (and not listed). Geometry guy 19:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I don't think it was appropriate to delist this article last fall. I added inline citations but the article is still of the same quality it was when originally assessed. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This re-assessment was not templated on the article talk page, which is why I proceeded with the GAN review. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]