Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Knights of Columbus/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: delisted —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
A year ago, this article was flagged as needing GA reassessment. Judging from the talk page it does not seem that there is a consensus whether it meets the GA criteria in terms of NPOV or covering all significant aspects (with a prose size of 14 kB, I find that doubtful). (t · c) buidhe 05:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wow, this is a mess...
- "The Knights promote the Catholic view on public policy issues, including opposition to same-sex marriage, abortion, and birth control." -- this info is present in the lead but not in the body, also doubling as a violation of WP:LEADCITE
- "History" section is woefully short even with the subpage.
- "Degrees" and "Membership" sections are extremely short.
- "Emblem of the Order" is entirely sourced to primary sources.
- Lots of sources are missing publisher/work and access date info.
- Given that this has been open since October and no one's even touched the GAR, I think it's safe to fast-track this one and delist. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I agree delist as per TPH above.--Smerus (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)