Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lam Tin/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: No improvements for two and a half weeks, issues remain. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
A GA from 2007. There's a good (or bad) amount of uncited material that should be addressed. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Deryck Chan: I see you've done some maintenance here after the start of the GAR. How do you see the article vs the GA criteria? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Getting there. It was 10 years since I last edited the article! Lam Tin was promoted to GA before paragraph by paragraph inline citations became mandatory, so there was some work to be done. In the meantime 10+ years of local history have happened. I've trimmed content that have become outdated. User:Underwaterbuffalo has also been doing great work brushing up the article. Deryck C. 10:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.