- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted because the issues were left unaddressed.–Retrohead (talk) 09:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
My main concern is that there is a massive number of [citation needed]s throughout. The article was promoted to GA back in 2010, and upkeep has been scant. The "features" section is also very scattershot and choppy. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)