Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Princes Street, Dunedin/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Article contains general references. Uncited material shows no evidence of being original research. Criterion 2 is met. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
A GA from 2011. There looks to be some uncited material needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've made a start on adding citations and updating material. The lower half of the articles (from "Below the Exchange" onward) should now be a bit better cited. Grutness...wha? 02:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.