Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Railway stations in Cromer/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: kept Procedural close, no vaild reason for delisting given by nominator. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC).
Looks too small to be a GA article therefore should be delisted. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 06:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- This is a spurious reason. There's no minimum or maximum article size at GAN; this is considerably longer than a large number of Featured Articles, let alone GAs. Which of the Good Article Criteria are you claiming that this no longer meets? – iridescent 15:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. If it passed on the review page, then you must specify to us which criteria you think it no longer meets, and size is not on the criteria. Rcsprinter (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- This should be an early procedural close unless the nominator offers other reasons for the nomination. A cursory read of the article doesn't lead me to think this reassesement needs to be open for long. Szzuk (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)