The article fails Good Article criterion 3(a) as it's not broad in its coverage: it lacks a section about the critical reception or the cultural impact of the character on the real world.
It also fails criterion 3(b) as the Game plot section is much too big (it goes into "unnecessary details") and the Other appearances section seems like a trivia section.
Delist per nom's concerns re: criteria 3a & 3b. The article also relies too heavily on primary sources to the point where it raises OR concerns. Majoreditor (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This article could do with a good copyedit, especially the Game Plot section as pointed out earlier. A heavy reliance has been indicated on primary sources, especially when considering that refs 3, 4 and 5 all point to the same article on the same website. This could potentially be expanded by identifying reviews of the game that refer to the character, or (possibly better) game guide sections. In terms of reception, a quick search indicates some spin-off merchandise based on the character (figures, jewellery etc.) which would possibly be useful. The image identified by nom is useful in the context presented, as it illustrates an interaction the character has that is described in the prose as "upward swimming". This would be unclear in meaning without the supplemental image, although possibly the connection could be made stonger. Gazimoff (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Guyinblack has done some good work compacting down the plot-laden sections, adding reception information and introducing a handful of third party sources. Gazimoff (talk) 02:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Reception and legacy" section has been added and sourced. Image:Yuna2.jpg has been removed from the article. I haven't played FFX-2, so I don't know the details surrounding the significance. Someone feel free to add it back in if they can expand the plot info appropriately. Plot clean up still in process. (Guyinblack25talk18:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]
