Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop/Archive/Mar 2014

< Wikipedia:Graphics Lab | Illustration workshop | Archive

Stale

edit

Aceh emblem

edit
  Stale
 – FOX 52 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): [[]] Request: please see if you can redraw and/or vectorize. thank you.. -- JanJC (talk) 11:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Request taken by Pbroks13 (talk) 20:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Resolved

edit

University of Swaziland

edit
  Resolved
 – FOX 52 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 
University of Swaziland logo
 
svg logo

Article(s): University of Swaziland

Request: Please convert this logo to svg -- Ludvonga (talk) 19:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Done This is the available official version; not really well done but we're fortunate enough that it exists. Cheers! -- Orionist ★ talk 21:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial flag of Gambia

edit
  Resolved
 – FOX 52 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  
    my file
  •  
    file I found already done

Article(s): List of British flags, Flags of the British Empire

Request:

Could someone please create an SVG file of the flag used by Gambia under British rule found on the page https://flagspot.net/flags/gm_col.html.

Graphist opinion(s):

Use File:Flag of the Gold Coast.svg and remove just one letter.--Antemister (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Done -- Orionist ★ talk 13:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...aaand I just found that this was already done months ago (see above). If there is nothing wrong with the other file, I'll nominate mine for deletion. -- Orionist ★ talk 13:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, which one is the one where the position of the letter "G" is teh better one?--Antemister (talk) 10:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


edit
  Resolved
 – FOX 52 (talk) 03:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 
Vectored

Article(s): Picket Fences

Request:

Needs a stand-alone logo for non-English Wikis. Can be black or any other color; prefer black though. Should be SVG. -- George Ho (talk) 09:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done- FOX 52 (talk) 03:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Layers of the GI Tract

edit
  Resolved
 – Goran tek-en (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  •  
    Layers of the Gastrointestinal tract (JPEG)

Article(s): {{Gastrointestinal wall series}} for use in multiple GI articles

Request:

I usually contribute to the workshop. However, a user wants to switch to the above image for use in a GI template to help standardize a bunch of the articles. Of course, I looked for a better image and couldn't find one. The issue is that the current image is in JPEG format and truly should be SVG, especially with text for easy translation. Anyway, I don't currently have the time to work on this image so if anyone else could create a vector version or something similar that would be fantastic. Let me say again, it does not have to be specifically an exact vector version of the above image. It can be a new diagram that is similar. Thanks -- The Haz talk 04:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Request taken by Goran tek-en (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Hazmat2 Now there is some drafts for you to view and give me feedback. I have made some versions but the only difference is the size of the text/numbers. Often requester wants the text to be visible at the standard thumbnail (220px) if that is possible. So I have made some bitmaps 220 px so you can see what the thumbnail will look like. I have made one version with numbers as that is one alternative. Numbers in the image and then the explanations in the page which also makes it easier to work with translations.
@Goran tek-en: Fantastic! Thanks for doing all the work. It's much appreciated. I personally didn't expect anyone to be able to read the text from the thumbnail, so that's not a problem. I prefer the size 14 text, and also the language-neutral numbered version. I would like it if you could upload both and I'll fill in any necessary information on the templates. Then I'll let the person creating the template know. I'm partial to the text version myself, but for the template, users might prefer the numbered one. We might as well have both options available on Commons and linked to each other via other_versions. Also, I can upload them, but I'd of course prefer that you be listed as the initial uploader. Just let me know. The Haz talk 21:51, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have got some problems with the rendering of the image. I will have to look into it and I don't know how long time it will take but I will be back. --Goran tek-en (talk) 13:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No rush. Take your time. Thanks again, The Haz talk 18:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After some extensive search I found two "microscopic" points which had no color or line which ruined the rendering, don't ask me why, I'm very happy I found them.
Layers of the GI Tract english

Layers of the GI Tract numbers
  Done --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you found them as well. I made some minor changes to the text version to standardize the two plexae names. I edited the code directly to translate some y-coordinates so I didn't mess with your Inkscape coding. I just added a tspan element and shifted a few things. Thanks again for doing this! The Haz talk 17:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That is what I need to learn more about working in the code directly, it seems as you know some about this? --Goran tek-en (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To an extent. I learned a little SVG coding back in 2002 but never really learned it well. Lately I've just been learning it by using [1] as a reference. Of course, I look at others' code as well. Adobe Illustrator adds a little extra code and does some things strangely but it's easy to fix. Inkscape tends to make a mess of the code so I stopped using that. The Haz talk 19:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could you then please tell me what code I have to remove/change when I have an Illustrator svg that won't open in Inkscape?
I have to have a program with a GUI and I want it to be OpenSource so I have to use Inkscape. It can't mess up the code that much because the images are validated by W3C [2]. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Map of the Queens Park Oval, Trinidad

edit
  Resolved
 – The Haz talk 14:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Article(s): Queen's Park Oval

Request:

Is it possible to create a map of the above ground based on the image found here and Google Map view, and this CGI image that can be used on the article to illustrate the layout of the ground, with a key to the various stands? I can put in the key if anyone is able to create the map image for me. I have zero computer artistic skill! -- S.G.(GH) ping! 13:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but I did it based on the image you gave. I left it language neutral so the title and key can be put in the article (and on the description page) instead of in the map so that it's easier to use in other languages as well. The Haz talk 19:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's brilliant, thank you! --S.G.(GH) ping! 11:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graph of global temperatures, actual vs. predicted.

edit
  Resolved
 – The Haz talk 00:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Global warming pause‎

Request:

At http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n9/fig_tab/nclimate1972_F1.html there is a chart that shows the observed global temperature change over the last 10-15 years (red/white hatched bar) and the predictions of 117 computer simulations (grey bars). This would be a useful illustration for our Global warming pause‎ article, but, alas, the image is not free. The data the chart was created from is free -- it is from NASA -- so someone could create a new graph and release it under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 License. Is anybody willing to create such an illustration? -- Guy Macon (talk) 14:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

Just for your information, those images are not copyrighted. Graphs, charts, and tables aren't considered "original works" and therefore don't meet the requirements for copyright protection. However, of course, if you add a bunch of original material, those part of the works are copyright-able. In this case, though, they don't come close.
Another note is that all "discoverable" data is also "free" as you put it. That means that even if a private lab came up with that data instead of NASA, it would still not be under copyright as it was discovered rather than created. The Haz talk 14:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  Request taken.: I uploaded the original for now. I'll create an SVG as well. The Haz talk 15:20, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Done: @Guy Macon: Let me know if you need or want something diffferent. The Haz talk 16:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And thanks for the explanation about image policy; good information to know.
Could you add the following labels?
Left image: "15 20 years (1993–2012)"
Right image: "10 15 years (1998–2012)"
Red bar on both: "Actual"
Gray bars on both: "Predicted"
Again, I really appreciate the help. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Guy Macon: No problem. However I think you mean 10 and 5 years. Anyhow, I put the "key" in each graph. Let me know how it looks to you. The Haz talk 19:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My calculator says we are both wrong.
2012 minus 1993 equals 19.
2012 minus 1998 equals 14.
(Note to self: next time, smoke crack after editing Wikipedia...)
The lead paragraph of the paper says
"Global mean surface temperature over the past 20 years (1993–2012) rose at a rate of 0.14 ± 0.06 °C per decade (95% confidence interval)"[3]
and later it says
"...as can be seen when comparing observed and simulated running trends from 1970–2012 (Fig. 2a and 2b for 20-year and 15-year running trends, respectively..."
so to stay true to the source it should be: left side 20 years, right side 15 years. Other than that, it looks perfect. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ha! I was reading it as 2002. I'll correct it. Note though that this is figure 1, not figure 2 from the article. And 19 and 14 are incorrect. The range is inclusive, not exclusive. The Haz talk 00:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, to quickly explain for anyone reading, the range here is [1993, 2012] rather than [1993, 2012) which is why you got 19 instead of 20. The Haz talk 00:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Perfect. The added key really makes the graph clear. Good work. We can close this request as "done". --Guy Macon (talk) 06:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the Sultanate of M'Simbati

edit
  Resolved

Article(s): List of historical unrecognized states

Request:

Could someone please create an SVG file of the flag of the Sultanate of M'Simbati (1959-1961) found on the page http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/tz_msimb.html. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.134.90.140 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 26 February 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):   Done: Please add categories to the image. The Haz talk 18:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, however the red should be orange, could you please change that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.134.90.140 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 28 February 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

  Done and reduced code. SiBr4 (talk) 12:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. But thanks, SiBr4. The Haz talk 14:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Hamilton

edit
  Resolved
 – SiBr4 (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Hamilton, Bermuda

Request:

Can anyone who knows how to upload non-free files please upload the coat of arms of Hamilton to WP? There is a section about the city's coat of arms in its article, but the article was mistakenly showing the (also non-free) CoA of the similarly-named Hamilton Parish, which didn't match the description in the "Coat of arms and flag" section. SiBr4 (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done: File:Hamilton Bermuda city crest.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazmat2 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 8 March 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. SiBr4 (talk) 17:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vexillology Ireland Flag

edit
  Resolved

Article(s): List of flags of Ireland

Request:

Could someone please create an SVG file of the flag of Vexillology Ireland: Brateolaíocht Éireann found at http://flagsireland.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/vibe-flag.png

Graphist opinion(s):

  Done. I gave it a go for you, anybody can feel free to improve on it if they wish Setanta Saki (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

edit
  Resolved
 – The Haz talk 17:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Article(s): Southern Christian Leadership Conference

Request:

Should be another easy request. There is some discussion on whether or not the vectorization of the logo (File:Logo of the SCLC.svg) is free or not (as computer code) so the best solution would be to have someone recreate the exact logo again, and release the vectorization under a free license. Thanks in advance for your consideration. -- -- TLSuda (talk) 22:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Done: It's free. Someone uploaded it with the wrong license to Wikipedia. Also, SVG recreation of a non-copyrightable logo is not a copyrightable derivative work. Note that in the United States, typefaces (which are often collections of vector works) are not copyrightable. As it's most definitely not copyrightable, I have already uploaded the file from WP to Commons with the correct license. The Haz talk 22:38, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it may not be free. SVGs are in their base form: code, similar to software. There is currently some ambiguity in whether the SVG code itself is copyrightable. There are reliable sources that go both ways, and to my knowledge no US government department has spoken up about this. -- TLSuda (talk) 22:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They actually have already spoken on it. Part of it is referenced on the link I wrote above. The legal document is a good read. The "medium" doesn't matter as much as the originality. The Haz talk 22:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think there is a misunderstanding. Your link talks about typeface. I'm talking about the SVG software code that can be creative. A metaphor would be that while a website's design is not necessarily copyrightable, its code is. Similar to the way a book cover could be non-copyrightable but the text itself could be. You are absolutely right about the typeface though. My request was simply because there I personally cannot find a good decision one way or another on the actual SVG code being copyright or not. -- TLSuda (talk) 00:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's my problem and I'm sorry; I had to leave as I was typing so couldn't finish my thought. Believe it or not I am referring to the code, which is what part of the the typeface decision refers to. However, to try to make a more direct argument pro-image I will give an example, and what people at the copyright office have told me. First, code is copyrightable. I write code, so I am aware of how it works. It was only found to be covered not that long ago. However, copyright law also covers output. Let's say Microsoft creates some software completely in Java with JPEG images (gasp!). You recreate it in C++ with PNG images. Maybe you even change some of the text. Nonetheless, the codes are very different. Copyright law states that just because you used different means, the end is still the same, the protected work of Microsoft. Your code and images are not copyrightable and are in fact, infringement. The argument is similar if you create the most perfect code to output a public domain work. I can use software to completely rewrite a public domain novel, but only the original parts I add (because we'll pretend I like writing prefaces) are copyrightable. Even if I make a few typos, it doesn't change the fact there there is not enough originality applied to the PD work. My contacts at the copyright office have assured me in the past using similar analogies. No matter what you do to arrive at the output, if the output (or something pretty close to it) is similar enough to a public domain work most or all of the derivative work are in the public domain. I greatly apologize if this doesn't make sense, but I can't think of a better way to explain it right now. All I know is that it made sense to me. I checked with the copyright office and was told it was correct. I have friends that have been working with similar things ever since, and their works--or at least large chunks of their works--are not copyrightable. The Haz talk 01:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfsangel

edit
  Resolved
 – FOX 52 (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  •  
    raster
  •  
    vectored

Article(s): Several

Request:

Please create a svg-version of the above file. Thanks in advance. -- P. S. Burton (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Request taken by FOX 52 (talk) 18:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC).:[reply]

  Done - FOX 52 (talk) 18:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. P. S. Burton (talk) 04:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


South Africa Coat of Arms

edit
  Resolved
 – Antemister (talk) 10:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): hundreds...

Request:

The new SVG file received some critism, as its color shades differ from the GIF. Is it possible to fix that? -- Antemister (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

Generally, GIFs have incorrect colors, so often the SVG creator tries to find evidence of the original design and colors. I'm not sure if that was the case here, but for now I've changed the colors to match. The Haz talk 17:31, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, well done. In fact, in most cases a GIF is not a source for color shade. But here it different (I compared with an offical flag book). Only the color of the supporter at the right seems to be not correct, was that a mistake?--Antemister (talk) 21:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
'Twas. Sorry about that. Fixed now.

  Done: The Haz talk 22:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no I can replace the GIF!--Antemister (talk) 10:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
edit
  Resolved
 – -- TLSuda (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Article(s): Hombres y Héroes

Request:

Simple request. The logo in File:Hombres y Heroes Logo 2.jpg is PD-textlogo (and therefore not copyright) but the photo of the logo is copyright. Therefore we could replace a copyright photo, with a non-copyright image logo. I was hoping that someone could create an image of the logo. Thanks in advance for your consideration. -- -- TLSuda (talk) 16:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

  Request taken by -- Orionist ★ talk 19:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

  Done Took longer than I expected. I used a scanned cover as a base to avoid camera distortion in the JPG we have here. Cheers! -- Orionist ★ talk 20:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks! -- TLSuda (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Georgian keyboard

edit
  Stale
 – SiBr4 (talk) 18:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  
    Incomplete Georgian (QWERTY) keyboard layout.

Article(s): Georgian alphabet, Georgian keyboard layout, Keyboard layout

Request:

I'm not sure if you're familiar with the concept of the Alt-Gr key. On most non-English keyboards, at least a few letters or symbols are available using the combination of Alt-Gr plus some other key. For example, the blue keys seen on this Portuguese keyboard are gotten with Alt-Gr (the red keys are combining keys - just ignore them; Georgian doesn't appear to have those)
Whoever made the Georgian keyboard image was unaware of it, and left all the Alt-Gr letters out. They need added back in, using the Portuguese Keyboard as the layout. A good source is selecting the Georgian (QWERTY) keyboard [not plain "Georgian" or "Georgian (Ergonomic)", which are completely different) at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/goglobal/bb964651.aspx and then pressing Alt-Gr which toggles it on.

If it's not too much problem, t would be helpful if the Georgian and Georgian (Ergonomic) keyboards could be made up as well - we don't appear to have either. In any case, the file we have needs overwritten and possibly renamed. -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

Liverpool and Manchester Railway - illustration by Clayton (train passing over Bridgewater Canal).

edit
  Stale
 – SiBr4 (talk) 18:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article(s): Liverpool and Manchester Railway

Request: For some reason this picture is shown laterally reversed; repros in authoritative books (Dendy Marshall [1930], R H G Thomas [1980] etc) all show it with the notice board on the left of the line, with the train on the left-hand track. From details: the towpath was on the west side of the canal, a background house (cut off in this repro) was south of the line, it is clear that the earlier version was correct. Can you turn it round, please?Hyjack7 (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see any way of putting this repro up in the box above. It is titled "File: Opening Liverpool and Manchester Railway.jpg" but this litho doesn't show the opening of the L&MR, it is merely a picture of a train crossing the Bridgewater Canal, published in 1831. Original title on the plate: "View of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway at the point where it crosses the Duke of Bridgewater's Canal. A.B.Clayton, delt. On stone by G.F.Nicholson." How or why it was given the misleading title "opening" etc, and became laterally reversed from its original state, I do not know. But it is certainly wrong to display it thus. Hope you can fix it.Hyjack7 (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):


Abdominal examination sketch

edit
  Stale
 – NikNaks talk - gallery 19:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  •  
    Please make it better...

Article(s): Abdominal examination

Request:

Not really sure how one would go about making this image more fit for the encyclopedia ... perhaps it would require complete remaking? Anyone interested in this task? Many thanks-- Lesion (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

It could be done, but the current image is somewhat confusing and incomplete to be sure. By itself, while it may suit some people for a quick study guide, in my opinion it isn't quite suited for WP. Why is "guarding and rigidity" pointing to musculature when it can come from any tenderness (especially peritonitis)? Also, I think there are so many different signs you'd look for in certain situations that 4 basic diagrams might be better with the article pointing to more specific signs. I'm not sure why shifting dullness belongs there while Murphy's sign does not. Nor do I put the majority of patients into left lateral decubitus during an exam. ;-) Any other opinions? The Haz talk 13:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the summary section of the file's entry on commons, it is a hand-drawn diagram "made while studying". Perhaps it is from a medical student. Before a graphist reworks the diagram, it might be better for some more feedback on the content as started above by Hazmat2. 4 basic diagrams sounds interesting, one for each stage of the exam I presume. Inclusion of missing signs and symptoms would be good. Imo (and this is not my area), guarding might be appropriately labeled at muscle since the muscles contract in guarding... Lesion (talk) 13:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose my overall opinion is that there are too many specific signs and symptoms to list on a diagram. However, basics are the place to start. The issue lies in what people consider basic, and therefore would be a point of contention for a diagram. For example, abdominal percussion is considered a basic exam skill, but it is not usually done unless warranted by the history or other findings. The same would go for shifting dullness. Opposite to this would be Murphy's sign, which I believe most would agree is more commonly checked for but may be slightly over the threshold of a basic exam skill. Checking for hepatosplenomegaly and tenderness is done on virtually every exam. Bowel sounds are auscultated on most exams, despite not being warranted by many histories. Bruits are incidentally checked for on almost every exam while you're listening for bowel sounds, but if normal they won't often be listed in a medical record. This is what I would consider "standard," as in what would be done during a preventive maintenance examination without specific complaints:
  1. Inspection
    1. (Pretty much as the diagram currently shows)
    2. Distention
  2. Palpation
    1. Tenderness / Rebound tenderness (present? location?)
    2. Guarding (present?)
    3. Hepatomegaly (present? size?)
    4. Splenomegaly (present?)
  3. (Percussion)
    1. (Not commonly done in a general exam)
  4. Auscultation
    1. Bowel sounds (normoactive, hyperactive, hypoactive?)
    2. Abdominal aortic bruit (present?)
    3. Renal artery bruit (present?)

Any comments are more than welcome. I won't be around to work on this so my apologies if I don't reply in a timely manner. The Haz talk 15:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm torn on this one user:lesion as a study diagram, I think it's brilliant but as a WP diagram.... not so much. I think it looses something as 4 separate diagrams. What are your thoughts on a 4 frame GIF with a diagrammed abdomen similar to this? Each frame would have a graphic representation superimposed of the significant potential positives but with letter labels (so it can be used in other languages).
The feeling that the diagram is not currently suitable for Wikipedia, both in terms of the slight "how-to" tone and the image quality, is what triggered me to post it here to see if it can be improved. Lesion (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What about that same abdominal picture in each of 4 quadrants with different colour backgrounds then a light effect, stethoscope, hands and percussing hands superimposed (inspect, perc, palp, ausc). Is your goal to create a diagrammatic representation of the examination or the potential findings? Former seems overly simple and the latter overly complex Ian Furst (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My goal was simply to make the diagram look better, or rather to highlight this to others who would make it look better ;p Happy for 4 separate diagrams. Per Hazmat2's comments above sounds like it would be mostly the latter, although now that you mention it a diagram of someone actually performing the stages of the exam would probably be more appropriate for the encyclopedia. Lesion (talk) 17:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A LIN TV Media Kit Located (For Uploading Vectorized Versions of Logos With)

edit
  Stale
 – NikNaks talk - gallery 19:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A LIN TV Media Kit (bottom Right Corner of Page 5 and Top of Page 8) located (for uploading vectorized versions of logos with). Please, thumb through each of the mentioned articles carefully, seeing whether the logo currently uploaded or the logo featured in the LIN TV Media Kit (bottom Right Corner of Page 5 and Top of Page 8) is of higher quality. Obviously, skip over the articles that I list as "Already Vectorized," for the corresponding logos from the LIN TV Media Kit (bottom Right Corner of Page 5 and Top of Page 8) have already been applied to those articles. I placed an arrow next to the articles already featuring a logo from the LIN TV Media Kit (bottom Right Corner of Page 5 and Top of Page 8). It's only a matter of common sense, such as maybe the corresponding logo in the LIN TV Media Kit (bottom Right Corner of Page 5 and Top of Page 8) might look fuzzier than an already-uploaded image. I've expressed some of these such judgments in some of the links below.

LIN TV Media Kit (bottom Right Corner of Page 5 and Top of Page 8) located, featuring the logos of the following TV Stations (Appearing In Alphabetical Order):
Also, Another LIN TV Media Kit (Top of Page 10) located, featuring the logos of the following TV Stations (Appearing In Alphabetical Order):

DizzyMosquitoRadio99 (talk) 00:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Hearst Corporation Media Kit Located (For Uploading Vectorized Versions of Logos With)

edit
  Stale
 – NikNaks talk - gallery 19:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Hearst Corporation Media Kit (Pages 17 Through Page 20) located (for uploading vectorized versions of logos with). Please, thumb through each of the mentioned articles carefully, seeing whether the logo currently uploaded or the logo featured in the Hearst Corporation Media Kit (Pages 17 Through Page 20) is of higher quality. Obviously, skip over the articles that I list as "Already Vectorized," for the corresponding logos from the Hearst Corporation Media Kit (Pages 17 Through Page 20) have already been applied to those articles. I placed an arrow next to the articles already featuring a logo from the Hearst Corporation Media Kit (Pages 17 Through Page 20). It's only a matter of common sense, such as maybe the corresponding logo in the Hearst Corporation Media Kit (Pages 17 Through Page 20) might look fuzzier than an already-uploaded image. I've expressed some of these such judgments in some of the links below.

Hearst Corporation Media Kit (Pages 17 Through Page 20) located, featuring the logos of the following TV Stations (Appearing In Alphabetical Order):

DizzyMosquitoRadio99 (talk) 08:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


ARMM symbols

edit
  Resolved
 – NikNaks talk - gallery 15:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 
ARMM emblem
 
ARMM flag
 
ARMM emblem SVG
 
Flag SVG

Article(s): Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao

Request:

Details of your request go here... Please vectorize-- Hariboneagle927 (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

One done. NikNaks talk - gallery 14:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  Done NikNaks talk - gallery 14:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I replaced the non-vector files.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of the Canadian Space Agency

edit
  Resolved
 – SiBr4 (talk) 18:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 
vectored


Article(s): Various

Request:

Please add in the official motto into this coat of arms. The maker of this image planed to insert the motto but didn't do so. the motto is AD FINEM ULTIMUM" (case sensitive), meaning "To the ultimate end" in Latin. Please also crop the image and feel free to do anything to improve the image.

Graphist opinion(s):

  Request taken by FOX 52 (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC).:[reply]

  Done - FOX 52 (talk) 03:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Logos of Colleges

edit
 
 
 
 
  Done   Done   Done   Done   Done
Logo as well
 
 
  Done   Done   Done

Article(s): Centennial College, Seneca College, Conestoga College, George Brown College, Algonquin College, Humber College, Niagara College, Fanshawe College, Durham College

Request: SVG.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HUmber College, Fanshawe College and Niagara College Logo still not yet converted to SVG format.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 06:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Any update.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 00:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please upload in Commons, but, make sure Humber College, Fanshawe College and Niagara College Logos are converted in SVG format.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 03:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Guys, Humber College logo still not yet converted to SVG format.--♥ Kkm010 ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 00:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion(s):

@Kkm010: I'll attempt to. However do I upload here or at Commons? Also what licensing info? ///EuroCarGT 00:43, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not to hate on your efforts, but some of the SVGs seem kinda autotrace-y. Shouldn't finding an official vector logo in a pdf or eps be more "official"? Sn1pe! (talk)(edits) 21:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then again, some colleges don't have vectors available, but I found one for Fanshawe Sn1pe! (talk)(edits) 21:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Sn1per: It's okay to hate on my efforts, I'm cool with that. Many logo with details are hard to vectorized as the software does not seem to do best with it. ///EuroCarGT 23:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Illustration_workshop/Archive/Mar_2014&oldid=1136091157"