Request: Please remove watermark. Couldn't just crop it off since it would take away part of the loco chimney as well André Kritzinger 14:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Great stuff, as usual, thanks! (Was going to also ask if my hand, at top left corner to get shade on the lens, could be removed but I didn't want to push my luck....) André Kritzinger 21:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Can't say I spotted that, actually, but I've cloned it out by assuming that what's next to it continues unchanged to the edge. It looks reasonable to me, but if it's not acceptable please feel free to revert. —SMALLJIM10:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! You're a wizard! André Kritzinger 11:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Request: Please fix perspective. Remove reflection on frame. Sharpen whenever possible (especially the 2nd one). And improve on the color and brightness, especially the third one... Gryffindor (talk) 01:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, maybe I'm imagining, but I still get the impression that the perspective is from above, the lower parts of the plaque looks smaller than they should be. Also the top of his head looks huge compared to the rest of his face...? Gryffindor (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize, but according to my opinion all is well. The proportions of image are correct. The dimensions of sides top-bottom and right-left are even. The head of person is written in circle. PawełMM (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Clean and improve somehow Joaquim Nabuco's photo, please. I'd like to see the signature's background removed and translucid. Perhaps, if possible, the signature should be darkened, since its quaility isn't that great and it will quite hard to visualize it correctly. Thank you very much, Lecen (talk) 02:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pawel, thank you very much for helping me out. However, I'd like to request you these: could Joaquim Nabuco's photo be more sharpen? Also, could you make the background in the signature transparent? Thank you again, --Lecen (talk) 13:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redone: Redone as you requested. The first one file was sharpened a little, but I could'n do more, becouse of very bad source file. PawełMM (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request:Watermark removal Hi folks! I've got this image of the interior of Mir, which was taken on STS-84 and as such is a NASA public domain image. Unfortunately, as NASA isn't exactly hot at updating its pages about old missions, it's not very high-res. There's a higher-res version of this on the Life website here, but unfortunately it's got a watermark on it (it's printed in Hall, R. editor. The History of Mir 1986-2000. London: British Interplanetary Society; 2000 without the watermark). If someone could please download a copy of the Life image, remove the watermark and upload it over the lower res image, I'd be very grateful. Thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s):
Done Removed the watermark and uploaded it as a new image (besides being higher-resolution, I don't find the Life image to be that much better). —Quibik (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for not adhering to your request. IMHO the Life version, while being higher-resolution, is somewhat blurry and not that much clearer. Also, its color balance and contrast look much weaker to me. So I would use the NASA version in an article (where it is downscaled anyway), but keep the Life version as a larger alternative. —Quibik (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FYI I have a tool for automatically removing the LIFE watermark with little to no damage - contact me if you ever need this. Dcoetzee03:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request photoshop sand over left and right lizards
Request: The middle lizard is the correct species. Left and right are wrong. Want to hide the wrong species. I think photoshop sand over them. Since it needs to go into a table list, cropping would lead to too bizarre of an aspect ratio that would make photo too long. P.s. There is a scary looking copyright tag, but FN looked at it and said it was CC-by-SA. TCO (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, man. We want you on speed-dial. Great to have these capabilities around and to acessess the help. Not have to learn every single thing by one person. I saw htat you are good maps as well. Very enticing!TCO (talk) 05:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
PawełMM, could you turn the first photo (the one with 2 princesses) into .png file and make the background translucid? Also, I noticed that Isabel's photo (the 1851 photo) is kind of... bluish. Could you also fix that? Thanks, --Lecen (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to be nitpicking, but... Kintetsubuffalo, you have requested the borders to be removed from quite a few city montages citing "WPMOS" as the reason. I am not aware of such guideline existing and searching did not help either. The most applicable guideline Wikipedia:Image use policy#Collages and montages does not mention this nor do any more general ones. I'm asking this because, personally, I find the borders in these images to be quite suitable, especially the inner ones. Obviously they are there to serve a function: they help keep the images visually separate. So, what MoS article are you referring to? —Quibik (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Trying to find it, it was something brought to my attention maybe a year and a half ago. I didn't know it previously. The border removal template itself says "Where borders are desired they should be added with wikimarkup or code." so it's here somewhere, I have seen it, just gotta find it. In the meantime, I understand what you are saying, but the montages are not uniformly done-some have thick borders, some thin, some already none at all before I found them. Whatever is done, there should be standardization. I'll keep looking.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. I hope you can find it.
About standardizing the look of the montages... Coincidentally, a while ago I spent some time developing User:Quibik/Montage template so a montage could be created from standalone images. This is obviously still very raw, but when developed further, perhaps this could be useful for this purpose? —Quibik (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: This image needs a careful and conservative restoration. It's extremely high resolution, so this will be a tedious and time-consuming job. Please accept only if you have significant experience with photo restoration, as this one will require a skilled hand. The scratches are probably too extensive to remove, but I imagine the spots could be removed, the blotches lightened, and perhaps the fingerprint removed. In addition, the contrast/brightness/curves need work, some of it localized. Kaldari (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Please, remove the line that can be seen at the middle of the photograph and correct any damage. Thank you very much, Lecen (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s):
Removed the central line and coherent noise. The image could be improved much further, but I don't enjoy working on images this big with the hardware that I have available. —Quibik (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Could something be done about the black line on the left and the white dots everywhere? Pretty much restore it alittle if its possible. Also could someone remove the writting on the second image. Spongie555 (talk) 06:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Could someone make the picture black and white instead of yellow if it's possible for the first. The second one could someone remove the white dots like on his head and shoulders pretty much restoration if possible. Spongie555 (talk) 06:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Please clean up in any way that makes it easier to see the image. Suggest:
Cut the middle black line.
Cut the "a" and "b".
Move the code labels on the bottom up closer to the shells
[EDIT] Let's please just cut the entire left "a" diagram. Take notches out of the right bottom 6 and the right top 2. Which gives us coded sample 9,3-6,2. (Just think for our use a single example is more efficient.)
(Consider, but not crucial)
If you think it should be vectorized, go ahead
I sorta "like" the wavy hand drawn look of the diagram, but feel free to redraw in any manner that does not change the basic anatomy or the "code". Can even change which divots are selected (i.e. coded examples), if desired, but no need.
If possible, if we could somehow make the numbers on the outer segments a little bigger (can expand the segment size a little if needed). Also make the notches a little more prominent.
Like how you got rid of the "b" and the caption within the diagram. (leave those out, I can cover with image caption anyhow.)
Like how we got rid of wasted space around the diagram.
Can we get rid of the checkerboard background?
We need some "notches cut out" of the numbered scutes. Need people to see that the turtle is actually being disfigured. I'm thinking if you can pick one different number from each "quadrant", that would work best, so that I can describe the code in caption. Probably 8 and 7 on the bottom, and 2 and 3 on the top. But does not matter exactly.
See, no checkerboard! The checkerboard is just the default background for vector graphics that aren't set against anything. When you actually see the image in an article, it looks significantly less checkery. As for the notches, you'd like one notch each in Top Left 2, Top Right 3, Bottom Left 8, and Bottom Right 7? BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe!04:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh...figured it was something like that on the chess board. Um...yes please on the notches. You can look at the original and see some (doesn't matter if they are triangle or square shaped notches, both are used) That's how they know what turtle it is 50 years later (literally a study has gone that long, and there was a turtle that old!)
OK. Please write it as 9,3-0,0 though (better clarity). And put it closer to the shell (old version wastes too much space).TCO (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fallschirmjäger, I noticed that there is still part of the crease in the sky/clouds are of the painting. Could you fix it, please? --Lecen (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Please, remove the frame and background of all pictures and make it translucid. The first painting of Prince Afonso already has a (worse) .png version [1] as well as the one with Pedro II as an infant [2], so you may simply upload the new pictures over both. Thank you very much, Lecen (talk) 14:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
PawełMM, Teresa Cristina's and Afonso's paintings still have their blue background. They were not removed. Also, is it possible to make all of them as you did with the painting of Pedro II as an adult? Is quite odd to see these squares all over the pictures, even though they actually do not appear in the article. But I believe the painting should be available even to users outside Wikipedia. Lastly, there is no need to change the contrast in Afonso's image. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Remove the watermark. I am completely out of element with this, but this looks like the right place to request this sort of thing, and hopefully someone can set me straight if I've goofed up in any way. Thanks in advance. :D Bobnorwal (talk) 05:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Please, remove the "shadow" (or blurred) line that can be seen at the right of all three pictures. Thank you very much, Lecen (talk) 01:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request: I would be grateful if something could be done with the unsightly telephone wires in these two photographs. I made a botched attempt at hiding the wires in the top left corner of the first image; pls let me know if you would like me to upload the original version instead. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!)13:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stale
that one, so he bite this star instead the globe.
Resolved
SAR Class 11 944 (2-8-2) (Freegold 6)_Freegold_6.JPG)
Request taken by Smalljim. 
Done —SMALLJIM 14:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
1st image
Done
2nd image
3rd image
png file, background transparent
png file
Gustav Otto with an Argus aircraft engine
Allan Zeman, dressed in black
Cape Town-Wellington Railway 9 (0-4-2WT).JPG)
A view of the interior of the Mir Core Module's docking node.
3 whiptail species of lizards
New image
Princesses Leopoldina and Isabel
Princess Isabel
png file,
Empress Teresa Cristina
png file
Francisco Solano López, Paraguayan dictator, 1870.
Bison skull pile
restored file
Open mass in commemoration of slavery abolishment in Brazil, 1888.
Pedro II of Brazil
Orélie-Antoine I
President Martin Van Buren
President Garfield
Venancio Flores, 19th century Uruguayan president
Joaquim Manuel de Macedo, Brazilian writer
png file
png file
png file
Diagram for permanently marking turtles
Emperor Pedro I declares Brazil independence of Portugal.
Emperor Pedro II of Brazil, 1846.
Emperor Pedro II of Brazil as an infant, c.1830.
Empress Teresa Cristina, 1846.
Afonso, Prince Imperial, 1846.
Afonso, Prince Imperial, 1845.
jpg
oval png
Class 43-000 43-001
Class 43-000 43-002
Main boiler house at British Engineerium, with unsightly wires
Another building there, with more wires,_The_Droveway,_Hove_(IoE_Code_365677).jpg)
,_The_Droveway,_Hove_(IoE_Code_365680).jpg)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Afonso_01_1846.png){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dompedroiibebe.png){kind=link}