Uploaded by YouAgain (notify | contribs). OR, there are two different revisions of this file. The older one is a duplicate of Image:MatthewDJohnston.jpg. The newer one has no information as to its source or who it is. The upload comment was "This is a picture of the young President." (Lesson: use distinctive filenames.) So the older one can be deleted as redundant, the newer as unsourced. BigDT00:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). Tagged as a PD work of the US government. The source website is not a government website and their copyright statement [1] makes it clear that they consider their works copyrighted. BigDT01:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, no indication that the source website has released its copyright. It may be a public domain image because of its age, although (1) there is no information on which to draw a conclusion and (2) the shadow makes this a creative derivative work and thus likely subject to copyright BigDT01:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Maybe this is lawyering, but still: it's a photo of the painting on the near-flat bottom of an ancient drinking vessel (a Cylix). As such, its object is not the shape of the vessel itself (which is 3D), but only the painting on it (which is 2D). Think of it as if it was an oil painting with a 3D sculpted frame. The main rationale behind the 3D-clause in the pd-art template (see Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.) is that reproductions of artworks that aim only at exact reproduction entail no creative act (as opposed to just technical skill) on the part of the photographer. This seems to apply here just as if it was a photo of an oil painting. See many similar pd-art-tagged photos on commons here: [2]. Thoughts? Fut.Perf.☼11:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was orphaned when I posted it. It no longer is [3]. At any rate, it seems to have been moved to Commons and deleted from enwiki [4] so it's a moot point. BigDT01:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was orphaned when I posted it. It no longer is [5]. At any rate, it seems to have been moved to Commons and deleted from enwiki [6] so it's a moot point. BigDT01:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use might include a screenshot; does fair use allow for a sequence or clip from a film? Do we really want animated gifs on articles? Luna Santin23:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that it shows such a significant part of the original work (i.e. reasonable quality and multiple shots) which isn't really necessary anyway, I think it would be pushing the fair use boundaries, and could be considered a copyright infringement. Is this image really needed to better show the comics? With all of the multiple images? I personally just find it distracting... Ian¹³/t08:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The image is downloaded from the site http://www.museum.ru they have the following copyright notice Russian: При полном или частичном использовании материалов активная ссылка на "Музеи России" обязательна - Full or parial usage of the materials allowed only with an active reference to the site "Museums of Russia". I have mistakenly put the fair use notice then it is in facr {{Freeprovidedthat}}. I have fixed the license tag, now it is a free image and can be used in the Beryozovo as well as possibly other articles. Keepabakharev22:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that it was only decoration. It was part of the migration of Victoria Crosses from a VC site whose owner wanted to hand over his material to wikipedia.--Historian21:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jason Palpatine (notify | contribs). The copyright/use of this icon image has come under dispute. I am its uploader. Its only use was with userboxes {{User 2001}} and {{User 2001 film}}. As the icon is being disputed as possibly being fair use instead of GLDF, I must in the interest of fainess ask for its speedy deletion. I have removed it from the userboxes in question and replaced it with a pair of commons non-copyrighted images that are at least appropriate to the subject. Thank-you for your prompt action in this matter. --Jason Palpatine22:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]