August 10

Uploaded by YouAgain (notify | contribs). OR, there are two different revisions of this file. The older one is a duplicate of Image:MatthewDJohnston.jpg. The newer one has no information as to its source or who it is. The upload comment was "This is a picture of the young President." (Lesson: use distinctive filenames.) So the older one can be deleted as redundant, the newer as unsourced. BigDT 00:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rebroad (notify | contribs). OR, UE. Also, the image on the television is probably copyrighted by someone. BigDT 00:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rebroad (notify | contribs). OR, "Copyright Rex Features, with permission", image contains a copyright logo and a source website name BigDT 00:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Holocron (notify | contribs). OR, UE. Description is "Picture of a spider in my garage". Yes. Specifically, one that has gone "splat". BigDT 01:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Hellosnakey (notify | contribs). OR, AU, user's only two contributions were uploads of presumably vanity photos BigDT 01:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Hellosnakey (notify | contribs). OR, AU, user's only two contributions were uploads of presumably vanity photos BigDT 01:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, Probably not public domain. Source website says, "©Absolute Cars - 2005/2006 - Automobiles de sport & de prestige" BigDT 01:24, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, no evidence that the source has released rights to the image BigDT 01:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). Tagged as a PD work of the US government. The source website is not a government website and their copyright statement [1] makes it clear that they consider their works copyrighted. BigDT 01:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, no indication that the source website has released its copyright. It may be a public domain image because of its age, although (1) there is no information on which to draw a conclusion and (2) the shadow makes this a creative derivative work and thus likely subject to copyright BigDT 01:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, ditto BigDT 01:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, globalsecurity.org is not a government website and this image is likely non-free BigDT 01:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, globalsecurity.org is not a government website and this image is likely non-free BigDT 01:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Emrrans (notify | contribs). OR, globalsecurity.org is not a government website and this image is likely non-free BigDT 01:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Skartsis (notify | contribs). OR, UE, likely CV BigDT 01:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ferdi90 (notify | contribs). OR, presumably a vanity pic, author's only contribution BigDT 01:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jadesaman (notify | contribs). OR, presumably vanity pic, uploader's only contribution BigDT 01:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Iamnotian (notify | contribs). OR, UE, vanity pic, and arguably downright freaky. These two images were the uploader's only contributions. BigDT 01:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Iamnotian (notify | contribs). OR, UE, vanity pic, and arguably downright freaky. These two images were the uploader's only contributions. BigDT 01:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by User:Royalbroil (notify | contribs). OR. Self-nomination. Image was used in an article about Richie Evans, appears to not meet usage criteria for a magazine cover. --Royalbroil 03:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by MikeAtari (notify | contribs). Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Wappen von Neu-Ulm.svg on the Commons. Tagged with a fair-use tag, but it's actually probably a free image, since it apparently came from the German Wikipedia. So orfud probably doesn't apply. —Bkell (talk) 03:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by MikeAtari (notify | contribs). Shadowing identical image of the same name on the Commons (commons:Image:Karte Illertissen in Deutschland.png). —Bkell (talk) 03:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Keeleysam (notify | contribs). OR, possibly CV, very poor Brands of the World resampling/imitation of the official Northwest Airlines logo; see Talk:Northwest Airlines#Northwest Airlines SVG Logo. Intended to replace PNG logo (Image:Nwa logo.PNG). Tinlinkin 05:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Updated--Keeleysam 07:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced logo is good and is now used in article. (Don't delete it!) Tinlinkin 08:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Banscomb (notify | contribs). WP:NOT a free file host. This is a personal resume of the user in PDF. This serves no enclyopedic content. «»Who?¿?meta 07:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Mema435 (notify | contribs). IRIN license template not permitted Mema435 10:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Deucalionite (notify | contribs). Copyvio. The source site is under copyright and PD-art can't apply because it is a 3D object (edges are quite visible).- 88.160.247.46 10:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Maybe this is lawyering, but still: it's a photo of the painting on the near-flat bottom of an ancient drinking vessel (a Cylix). As such, its object is not the shape of the vessel itself (which is 3D), but only the painting on it (which is 2D). Think of it as if it was an oil painting with a 3D sculpted frame. The main rationale behind the 3D-clause in the pd-art template (see Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.) is that reproductions of artworks that aim only at exact reproduction entail no creative act (as opposed to just technical skill) on the part of the photographer. This seems to apply here just as if it was a photo of an oil painting. See many similar pd-art-tagged photos on commons here: [2]. Thoughts? Fut.Perf. 11:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted. Fut.Perf.'s argument makes sense. howcheng {chat} 18:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by DezignViz (notify | contribs). Summary is "My views regarding the fate of the CAD software ...". Wikipedia is not free webhosting. BigDT 11:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by DezignViz (notify | contribs). Advertisement. Wikipedia is not free webhosting. BigDT 11:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Cool Cat (notify | contribs). OR, description is, "I hate bush, but I am bored as well, why not?" BigDT 11:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not orphaned; see Axis of evil. —Bkell (talk) 18:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was orphaned when I posted it. It no longer is [3]. At any rate, it seems to have been moved to Commons and deleted from enwiki [4] so it's a moot point. BigDT 01:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Cool Cat (notify | contribs). OR, description is, "I don't like rice either and was still bored... " BigDT 11:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not orphaned; see Outposts of tyranny. —Bkell (talk) 18:41, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was orphaned when I posted it. It no longer is [5]. At any rate, it seems to have been moved to Commons and deleted from enwiki [6] so it's a moot point. BigDT 01:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Cruise (notify | contribs). OR, a JPEG of a logic table where a straight Wiki table would be much more useful and not have severe JPEG distortion. BigDT 11:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by DrBat (notify | contribs). Tagged as fair use screen grab but this is an assembly of screenshot frames into an animated gif, so is not copyright of the IP owners of the illustrated subject (Arclight (comics))), but of an individual YTMNDer who made this. Just zis Guy you know? 14:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's a scene from the movie. Putting some images together from a movie doesn't let you copyright it. --DrBat 18:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use might include a screenshot; does fair use allow for a sequence or clip from a film? Do we really want animated gifs on articles? Luna Santin 23:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that it shows such a significant part of the original work (i.e. reasonable quality and multiple shots) which isn't really necessary anyway, I think it would be pushing the fair use boundaries, and could be considered a copyright infringement. Is this image really needed to better show the comics? With all of the multiple images? I personally just find it distracting... Ian¹³/t 08:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Alex_Bakharev (notify | contribs). Fair use image that was only being used as decoration in Berezovo (now removed), violating WP:FAIR#Counterexamples #2 and WP:FAIR#Policy #8. howcheng {chat} 21:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The image is downloaded from the site http://www.museum.ru they have the following copyright notice Russian: При полном или частичном использовании материалов активная ссылка на "Музеи России" обязательна - Full or parial usage of the materials allowed only with an active reference to the site "Museums of Russia". I have mistakenly put the fair use notice then it is in facr {{Freeprovidedthat}}. I have fixed the license tag, now it is a free image and can be used in the Beryozovo as well as possibly other articles. Keep abakharev 22:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn. howcheng {chat} 23:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Historian (notify | contribs). Fair use image in Duncan Gordon Boyes (removed) that was serving only as decoration. howcheng {chat} 21:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree that it was only decoration. It was part of the migration of Victoria Crosses from a VC site whose owner wanted to hand over his material to wikipedia.--Historian 21:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jason Palpatine (notify | contribs). The copyright/use of this icon image has come under dispute. I am its uploader. Its only use was with userboxes {{User 2001}} and {{User 2001 film}}. As the icon is being disputed as possibly being fair use instead of GLDF, I must in the interest of fainess ask for its speedy deletion. I have removed it from the userboxes in question and replaced it with a pair of commons non-copyrighted images that are at least appropriate to the subject. Thank-you for your prompt action in this matter. --Jason Palpatine 22:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Saopaulo1 (notify | contribs). Unfree image OB by free use Image:Ferrybuilding1.jpg. howcheng {chat} 23:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by SAUNDERS (notify | contribs). Two of the three buses have been replaced by Image:MetroExpress.jpg and Image:MetroLocalnew.JPG, significantly weakening the fair use claim.. Lastly, someone else uploaded Image:LACMTA Rapid Bus.jpg, a fair use image should replace the this one. Hbdragon88 23:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted. See talk. howcheng {chat} 18:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Idleguy (notify | contribs). Copyright violation: this is not property of NIH but of ADAM.com! Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 23:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ranam (notify | contribs). Orphan, shaky source information, conflicting licensing claims. —Bkell (talk) 23:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ranam (notify | contribs). Shaky source information, conflicting licensing claims. —Bkell (talk) 23:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Karrmann (notify | contribs). Fair use image OB by Image:Ford-Contour.jpg. howcheng {chat} 23:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]