May 7

edit
Uploaded by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (notify).

graphic taken from http://www.nychinatown.org/history/1800s.html, uploaded to wikipedia under a public domain license and wrongly attributing author to http://r2.gsa.gov/fivept

  • Delete: A person claiming to be the creator of the file posted on the image's talk page that he doesn't grant usage permission for this or any other of his graphics. --cholmes75 14:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (notify).

graphic taken from http://www.nychinatown.org/history/1800s.html, uploaded to wikipedia under a public domain license and wrongly attributing author to http://r2.gsa.gov/fivept

Uploaded by Jidan (notify). OP jidan 00:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jidan (notify). OP jidan 00:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Ssysak (notify). UE, OR. User's only other contributions were to an article titled "most beautiful girl ever", which has been speedy deleted twice, once as an A7 bio, once as a re-creation. This image was intended to be part of that article -- Saberwyn 13:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Thibaultviaene (notify). CV, AB. Fair use is claimed in Marc Dutroux, but I don't believe it is, because it isn't an image of him, it's just an image of a protest resulting from his actions. The uploader, User:Thibaultviaene, has not contributed to Wikipedia since January. Angr (talkcontribs) 13:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by ZS (notify). Image was uploaded with incorrect naming; is now OB by Image:GTAIII PC vehicles Securicar.jpg25 ◀RingADing▶ 14:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded by Zoo box (notify). CV ccwaters 15:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Astromoose (notify). Book does not exist. Part of hoax attempt by uploader to attempt to attribute the mathemematical principle — Maximum principle — to John Maximum. See contributor's talk page for discussion on book.- —ERcheck @ 16:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Mich@ł 20:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Captainshowbiz (notify). Says it's used with permission, then says no rights reserved. One of them has to be wrong, and I suspect it's the latter. If so, then permission images need a fair use rationale, but this image is orphaned, so it would be orphaned fair use.- Rory096 21:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]