Wikipedia:Images of living people
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
2 possible suggested wordings for the proposal. Comments are still welcome
Copyright (nonfree) Images of living people in English language Wikipedia
Wikipedia strives to produce and distribute free content which is perpetually free for unlimited distribution, modification, and application for all users and in all mediums. This goal could best be met by completely disallowing all nonfree (copyright) images where the significance of the image is that it serves to identify a particular living person
Andrew Levine's suggested amendment
Wikipedia strives to produce and distribute free content which is perpetually free for unlimited distribution, modification, and application for all users and in all mediums. This goal could best be met by completely disallowing all nonfree (copyright) images where the only significance of the image is that it serves to identify a particular living person, with limited exception for individuals who may not be lawfully photographed (see exceptions)
Could you guys transfer these to the discussion, where they properly belong I think. Thanks.--luke 07:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- What if the subject is serving a life term in prison?
- What if it's a photo of an erstwhile porn star who is now old and ugly and whose current image badly represents the article? - crz crztalk 18:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Objections by - User:Stick Fig
edit- A person's look is often a large part of the story, and recognition of faces may be just as important as name.
- Quality arguments need to be taken into consideration, not just binary (it's all the same) arguments. A cell phone photo, for example, is not a suitable replacement for a professionally-shot studio photo. The license should not be the only deciding factor.
- The level of information provided by an article should not be significantly lessened by a fair use image's removal. - Stick Fig 22:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Objections by - User:Lankiveil
editWhile it would be great to be able to use a free image wherever one is required, this is not currently practical. Many articles are enhanced immeasurably by even a single image, but the image has to be a good one. Removing images from biography articles for licence reasons is a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater - you might have a freer encyclopædia, but you'll have one that is less informative, educational, and interesting.
Working to reduce the number of fair use images on Wikipedia by replacing them with equivalent-quality free images is a laudable goal, but it will not be achieved with a blanket ban.