Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/Assessment
Assessment
editLondon Transport articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | Total | ||
![]() |
3 | 8 | 6 | 17 | 34 | ||
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | ||
![]() |
2 | 19 | 29 | 61 | 111 | ||
B | 10 | 32 | 48 | 101 | 191 | ||
C | 5 | 22 | 54 | 320 | 401 | ||
Start | 8 | 92 | 1,093 | 1,193 | |||
Stub | 12 | 413 | 425 | ||||
List | 3 | 4 | 10 | 22 | 39 | ||
Category | 312 | 312 | |||||
Disambig | 30 | 30 | |||||
File | 33 | 33 | |||||
Portal | 587 | 587 | |||||
Project | 25 | 25 | |||||
Redirect | 46 | 947 | 993 | ||||
Template | 119 | 119 | |||||
Other | 1 | 1 | |||||
Assessed | 25 | 94 | 252 | 2,075 | 2,054 | 4,500 | |
Total | 25 | 94 | 252 | 2,075 | 2,054 | 4,500 | |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 10,914 | Ω = 4.63 |
This table is generated automatically every 2 to 3 days. Click here and enter London_Transport to start an update.
Quality scale
edit- Category:FA-Class London Transport articles
- Category:FL-Class London Transport articles
- Category:GA-Class London Transport articles
- Category:B-Class London Transport articles
- Category:C-Class London Transport articles
- Category:Start-Class London Transport articles
- Category:Stub-Class London Transport articles
- Category:List-Class London Transport articles
- Category:Unassessed London Transport articles
Grading scale
editClass | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Brill Tramway (as of March 2015) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Timeline of the London Underground (as of March 2015) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Class Not Used |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Blackwall Tunnel (as of March 2015) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | London Heathrow Airport (as of March 2015) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Gants Hill tube station (as of March 2015) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | 55 Broadway (as of March 2015) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Ealing rail crash (as of March 2015) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of London railway stations (as of March 2015) |
Each London Transport related article should have an assessment of quality and importance on its talk page using the {{WikiProject London Transport}} template, such as {{Wikipedia:WikiProject_London Transport|class=B|importance=high}}
.
Quality scale
editThe following quality classes are used to categorise articles on Wikiproject London Transport:
- Stub class: No structure, only brief sentence or two - Use
class=Stub
- Start class: Some structure, brief paragraphs - Use
class=Start
- C class: improved structure and details separating article into topics but requiring, further development such as references, images, etc. - Use
class=C
- B class: developed structure, at least one paragraph for most required headers, in-line sourcing, includes map and at least one image - Use
class=B
- Good Article (GA) class: all required headers with complete coverage of subject and relevant images. Must have been nominated for and have passed a Good Article review - Use
class=GA
- List: an article that takes the form of a list rather than prose. An introduction is still required and images may be included - Use
class=List
- A class: NOT USED
- Featured Article (FA) class: complete, professional standard article, which must have been nominated for and have passed a Featured Article Review - Use
class=FA
- Featured List (FL) class: complete list, which must have been nominated for and have passed a Featured List Review - Use
class=FL
Other administrative classes for use on non-article pages include:
- Portal class: for the Wikiproject London Transport portal and its sub-pages - Use
class=Portal
- Project class: for the project page and sub-pages - Use
class=Project
- Category class: for categories - Use
class=category
Importance scale
editTop | Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopaedia |
High | Subject contributes a depth of knowledge |
Mid | Subject fills in more minor details |
Low | Subject is mainly of specialist interest. |
Log
editAugust 18, 2024
editRemoved
edit- Draft:Lea Interchange Bus Company (talk) removed.
August 17, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Thameslink (1997–2006 train operating company) renamed to Thameslink (train operating company, 1997–2006).
Assessed
edit- Thameslink (train operating company, 1997–2006) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
August 16, 2024
editAssessed
edit- Thameslink (1997–2006 train operating company) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
editAugust 15, 2024
editRenamed
edit- A182 road renamed to A roads in Zone 1 of the Great Britain numbering scheme.
- A189 road renamed to A roads in Zone 1 of the Great Britain numbering scheme.
Reassessed
edit- London Buses route 466 (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- London Buses route SL5 (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
August 13, 2024
editRenamed
edit- WP:Featured topics/List of London Monopoly locations renamed to WP:Good topics/List of London Monopoly locations.
- Metropolitan Police Roads and Transport Policing Command renamed to Roads and Transport Policing Command.
Reassessed
edit- Accessibility of transport in London (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class. (rev · t)
- Addison Lee (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- List of stations in London fare zones 7–16 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Carbodies (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Ecotive Metrocab (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- WP:Good topics/List of London Monopoly locations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- LEVC TX (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- London EV Company (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- MCW Metrocab (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mercedes-Benz taxi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Metrocab (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Nuffield Oxford Taxi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Roads and Transport Policing Command (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- The 12.30 from Croydon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- William Beardmore and Company (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Worshipful Company of Hackney Carriage Drivers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Draft:Hanwell And Elthorne (talk) removed.