Nominated November 22 2013; voting ended December 21 2013

Support:

  1. Bddmagic (talk) 15:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • This article is in pretty good shape right now....it could just use a bit of tweaking.
Nominated 23 October 2010; voting ended 30 October 2010

Support:

  1. Eclipsed (talk) 13:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • "The Indian magicians article has large POV problems. I don't know anything about magic so I was hoping someone could help me revise" - anonymous user
Nominated 14 October 2010; voting ended 21 October 2010

Support:

  1. Eclipsed (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Graceconcepcionr (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:


(Statistics will follow)

The voting that got it here

edit

Nominated October 3, needs three votes by October 10

Support

  1. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 19:57, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)
  2. Ta bu shi da yu 22:29, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  3. TrollQueen 06:50, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • Let's start this off with a real nomination. Michael Ammar is a stubby article on a particular noteworthy close up magician. It should really be expanded. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 19:57, Oct 3, 2004 (UTC)
  • Looks interesting. TrollQueen 06:50, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Nominated October 18, needs three votes by October 25

Support

  1. [[User:Aranel|Aranel ("Sarah")]] 15:33, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 09:37, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)
  3. GUllman 22:54, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  4. The Anome 12:59, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Comments

  • Improving this list would give folks a good base for figuring out what else needs more work. [[User:Aranel|Aranel ("Sarah")]] 15:33, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Just a reminder we should keep copyright in mind when expanding this. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 09:37, Oct 21, 2004 (UTC)