Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Miramar/Approved

< Wikipedia:Miramar
  1. Stunteltje (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Will be used for categorising ships in Commons:Category:Ships to Commons:Category:Ships by name, Commons:Category:Ships by IMO number and so on.
    @Stunteltje: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Llammakey (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Will be using this for information on lakers of the Great Lakes, lesser known and recent Canadian naval units and for modern warships of smaller, non-English nations that might not have a lot of info in English about launch dates and so forth.
    @Llammakey: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SteKrueBe (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Will use Miramar for further merchant ship articles and to provide other users in wp:de eg. de-Portal:Schifffahrt with missing ship details. --SteKrueBe (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @SteKrueBe: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Apwoolrich (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)In my 'other life' I am the Hon Curator of a small museum in an English seaport that has an extensive maritime collection, so it will be well used.Apwoolrich (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Apwoolrich: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sander1453 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm not a very prolific editor on ships and shipping, just some 40 new articles in three years. So I wouldn't mind staying on the bottom of this list, even if it exceeds the agreed number and that means me falling off. Sander1453 (talk) 13:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sander1453: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Amqui (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I wrote a lot of articles on ships and navies on the French Wikipedia and would benefit from a resource like that to develop them or create others. Amqui (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Amqui: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I hope to use Miramar to update the articles of smaller, less-well-known ships, like HMT Richard Bacon and Titilupe, as well as classes such as the Axe-class trawler. This is very difficult to do with traditional sources, as they don't cover smaller ships in any real detail - often just a name and launching date. I also enjoy the occasional ship with an unusual history, such as HMS Porcupine (G93) or the Landing Craft (Gun) Tower. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 21:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Rsteen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I wish to use Miramar for ships from Scandinavia and articles in Danish (we lack a lot of ship articles). Miramar would also be of great help in the work I do on Commons, categorizing paintings and photographs. --Rsteen (talk) 23:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rsteen: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I wish to use Miramar for Austro-Hungarian and Yugoslav vessels from WWI and WWII, I have several FA ship and class articles. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Peacemaker67: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ahecht (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)/Ahecht (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I frequently update ship articles, images, and categorizations on both English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Most of my work is correcting bad information or adding missing categorization or infobox fields, not article creation, but I think that Miramar would be a valuable resource for me. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE    ) 14:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ahecht: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mendaliv (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Lower priority request from me: I'm mostly interested in doing law articles, but I can see a great use of this resource when I hit articles on maritime law, especially those involving ship accidents. See, for instance, Collision between MV Testbank and MV Seadaniel (which I wrote); it would be nice to get authoritative information on those ships from a good registry to flesh out articles like that. But I know there are a lot of people who are dedicated to writing about ships, so I'd be happy to let them claim the accounts if demand outstrips supply. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 17:25, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mendaliv: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Gilgamesh (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) i am an active editor in the field of history with numerous articles on this subject. part of my editorial work is leading a combined team of retired israeli marine personal, some of whom have high military ranks. the well sourced material will allow our team to enrich our articles with a good sourced material. Gilgamesh (talk) 06:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gilgamesh: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Thewellman (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I spent three years at sea and have written a number of articles about defensively equipped merchant ships, military conversions and convoy losses of civilian shipping during the world wars. I frequently seek information about the prior and subsequent history of these ships, and would value access to additional information sources.
    @Thewellman: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sas1975kr (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am very interested in naval history and wrote a lot of FA and GA articles about ships on Russian and Ukrainian wikis. And I'm interested in access to the Miramar Ship Index for improve articles of the Russian wiki's Admiralty Project. --Sas1975kr (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sas1975kr: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Inctructor (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am also interested in naval history and wrote a lot of GA articles about ships on Russian wiki.And I'm interested in accessing the index Miramar courts to test article of the Russian Admiralty wiki project.--Inctructor (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Inctructor: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Gbawden (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) I create a number of South African Navy related articles, including vessels. This resource would be a useful only resource to find information Gbawden (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gbawden: You don't have a valid email enabled - can you please let me know once you've done that? Nikkimaria (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: How do I do that? I thought it was enabled as I had Highbeam access previously. Also, I received a email from WP over the weekend notifying me about change user rights Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gbawden: Go to your Preferences, scroll down to "Email options", and check the box that says "Enable email from other users" - I'm getting a message that indicates this is not checked. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:48, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Doh! Done Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gbawden: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Burgh House (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm only interested in the RMS St. Helena, for use on http://sainthelenaisland.info/rms.htm. John Turner, Burgh House (talk) 11:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Burgh House: If you're only interested in a single ship, it might make more sense to request that single page at WP:RX. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: Sorry, I should have been clearer. There have been two RMS St. Helena's in recent times and some (many?) other ships called St. Helena. I'm trying to research them all ... John Turner, Burgh House (talk) 11:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Burgh House: Okay. My other concern would be that you are relatively inactive on Wikipedia, and thus that the source would not be well used here. Do you think otherwise? Nikkimaria (talk) 12:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: If by "relatively inactive" you mean that I don't update many pages you may be right. But I use Wikipedia as my main source of research information. How about you allocate me access for 1 month, and I'll let you know if I'm finished with it earlier? John Turner, Burgh House (talk) 12:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Burgh House: Unfortunately I don't have that option - it's either one year, or not at all. Would you be able to use it to improve Wikipedia in that timeframe? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ravenswing (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)) Good evening! I'm an editor of over ten years and 40,000 edits, and my interests in this database pertain to Age of Sail and medieval nautical articles, as well as nautical Wikignome work. Ravenswing 03:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ravenswing: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bahudhara (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'd like to be granted access because I have an interest in the maritime history of Port Adelaide and the vessels which called or were associated with it since colonisation in 1836, including: clippers such as the City of Adelaide; the Royal Navy's Australian Auxiliary Squadron, which existed in the decade prior to the Federation of Australia in 1901, and the later establishment of the Royal Australian Navy; the German-flagged merchant vessels in Australian waters at the outbreak of WWI, which were seized as prizes and transferred to the Commonwealth Government Line; immigrant vessels; and vessels of the Adelaide Steamship Company. FYI, due to a lack of success in recruiting new editors through holding Wikipedia meetups over the past couple of years, including at the Maritime Museum in Port Adelaide, last year I set up the Adelaide Environment & Heritage Wiki. However, I don't see this as a potential COI because this new community-based wiki is intended as a parallel project to Wikipedia, providing a supportive local environment and training ground for new editors, and focussing more on vessels such as the 360-odd trading ketches which operated in South Australian coastal waters up to 1980 (nearly all of which won't meet Wikipedi's notability guidelines, or the ban on original research, since there is the opportunity to capture material from oral histories). Over time this project will (hopefully) train new editors, and feed more verified content back into Wikipedia.
    @Bahudhara: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. FiendYT (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I will be using this to create disambiguation pages for ships with the same name. Will also use to create articles about certain ships. FiendYT ★ 05:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @FiendYT: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email)I mostly work on articles of ships, submarines and other marine vehicles that are related to Indian Navy and access to the ship index database will help me to improve them. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 09:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    See Approved  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 08:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I would use this to further improve the suite of articles I have produced on the Royal Yugoslav Navy, half-a-dozen of which are already Featured. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved
a long time ago.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. SteKrueBe (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I used the Miramar Ship Index for nearly a year now. It was often in use and extremely helpful in completing missing ship information. Since my access will expire at 31st of march 2017 i request to carry on with using Miramar for my work on merchant ship articles and provide other users with ship information. --SteKrueBe (talk) 13:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved
.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Rsteen (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) As my Miramar account seems to have run out, I wish to renew it. It has been extremely helpful, for instance in making List of ships built at John I. Thornycroft & Company, Chiswick in English and Danish. --Rsteen (talk) 16:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Rsteen: Your subscription expired? I was told that all accounts had been renewed. Did it expire along time ago?  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lingzhi: Hi. I've been doing other things for a couple of weeks and when I returned, it was no longer miramarshipindex.org.nz, but a redirect to miramarshipindex.nz, who denied ever having heard of me (no chance of getting a new password, etc). I may be doing something wrong, but right now I'm stuck. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 10:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please send me an email from the address you gave them when you got the subscription, and in th email please tell me any info you had to tell them back then too. I'll email and ask...  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 11:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lingzhi: Hi. Answer should be in your email now. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Rsteen: I have corresponded with Miramar and sent their reply to you. Please let me know when this situation is resolved to your satisfaction. Thanks...  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 21:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lingzhi: The key was to register a "7-day free trial" using the original username and password. Then full rights were restored. By the way Miramar's new design is a definite improvement. So you can mark this as resolved. With thanks --Rsteen (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Sturmvogel_66 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I need access to fill in the details of ships involved in accidents with warships of the Royal Navy.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @SSturmvogel 66: Approved Expect an email shortly with further details.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miramar/Approved&oldid=1138543783"