| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe that I found all information that needs to be said for this page that is credible except for a few that I don't know how to word it or it should probably not be in the article since it's pretty vague. I fully remade the 11th millennium BC page, so I can't really respond to the previous GA's because of that. There is some things that are probably a little too specific, but it's better to record everything in the subject than being sparse like what I did a year ago. I'm also submitting this here so there can be a higher chance of the 11th millennium BC to have a GA since I want it to have the same quality has the 9th and 10th millennium BC's.
Thanks, FerdinandLovesLegos (talk) 03:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- My only comment is that as it's a long article more illustration would be helpful. Crops, early domestic animals, archaelogical finds? Do any of the open access journals provide anything like this that could be used? In general, something as specialist as this needs an expert to check through IMO - I would be inclined to reach out to an academic who could read it through for a sense check. Jim Killock (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)