Wikipedia:Peer review/1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?)/archive1
We (WikiProject The KLF) have recently improved The KLF to Featured Article status, and we are turning our attention now to our articles on the band's recordings. Our aim is to create readable, enjoyable, comprehensive and factually accurate articles, using inline citations and relevant quotations wherever possible. 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) was the duo's debut album. I am requesting peer review to raise any issues which reviewers think might prevent this article being promoted to an FA or which would cause you to object to such a nomination. Thanks very much in advance for all contributions. --Vinoir 14:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles).
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
- Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.
- Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like:18 mm. - Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
- You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
- Thanks, Andy t 19:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Good point, thanks. Will add to Todo list and report back soon.Will fix that right now.Missing caption done.Going on to the To Do list.Ditto.
Much better this time, script! :) Any humans care to comment? --kingboyk 12:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- All done, and looking better for it. Thanks for the suggestions. --Vinoir 22:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)