Wikipedia:Peer review/2021 Serbian local elections/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am planning to nominate it for GA, and I'm unsure if the article itself is 100% completed.
Thanks, Vacant0 (talk) 14:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments by Zetana
editI've made some initial copy-edits and prose work (Special:Diff/1047110912), feel free to revert some or all of them if you disagree. I'll post some more feedback in a bit; I'll go section by section. Zetana (talk) 02:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Overall, I think the article has most information that a reader would be looking for. Personally, I'd switch the Electoral system and Background sections so Electoral system is first, followed by Background. I don't know anything about Serbian politics, so I'd be interested in having some summaries of the parties in the running (did they campaign on any specific issues?). I also think the Background and Results sections could use more information (why'd Preševo's city council get dissolved in 2017? what did Movement for Krajina campaign on? what were the results of the "multiple elections"? etc. / was there any polling information predicting election results? what did political parties say about the results? etc.) as well.
In case you haven't seen it already, there's a number of elections-related FAs at Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referendums § Featured articles that might be a good reference. I can post section-specific comments on prose tomorrow. Zetana (talk) 06:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the cleanup and for the comment. I'm going to expand the article by the end of this week and on top of that, I will add more summaries of things that you have suggested. I'm also going to look through the featured articles since they will probably help me while writing. I appreciate this and thanks again, Cheers --Vacant0 (talk) 22:27, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, no problem. Let me know when you've finished expanding the article, and I can leave more detailed feedback to help refine the prose. Zetana (talk) 02:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, looks much improved from when I first read it! Just asking again if you found any information about what the parties campaigned on, otherwise I don't have much else to add. I'll take a couple days to read the article again and think, I'll ping you to let you know if I've come up with anything else. If not, then I'll start on some more prose comments. Zetana (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I haven't found any information regarding campaigns. --Vacant0 (talk) 20:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll take some time to think over the article again, but I should be able to get back to you by Friday or so. Zetana (talk) 03:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- sorry I haven't gotten back to this, I will leave some more feedback tomorrow as soon as I can. Zetana (talk) 07:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, I think the article's pretty complete and isn't missing any major details. Regarding comments on prose: how would you like me to give them? I can make my edits directly to the page and you can revert whichever ones you disagree with. Or, I can copy the page over to my sandbox and make prose edits there, and you can pick and choose the ones you prefer (for example, this is what I did for Pan Am Flight 7). Zetana (talk) 04:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, feel free to make any prose edits on the article itself. --Vacant0 (talk) 18:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, I think the article's pretty complete and isn't missing any major details. Regarding comments on prose: how would you like me to give them? I can make my edits directly to the page and you can revert whichever ones you disagree with. Or, I can copy the page over to my sandbox and make prose edits there, and you can pick and choose the ones you prefer (for example, this is what I did for Pan Am Flight 7). Zetana (talk) 04:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- sorry I haven't gotten back to this, I will leave some more feedback tomorrow as soon as I can. Zetana (talk) 07:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll take some time to think over the article again, but I should be able to get back to you by Friday or so. Zetana (talk) 03:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- I haven't found any information regarding campaigns. --Vacant0 (talk) 20:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, looks much improved from when I first read it! Just asking again if you found any information about what the parties campaigned on, otherwise I don't have much else to add. I'll take a couple days to read the article again and think, I'll ping you to let you know if I've come up with anything else. If not, then I'll start on some more prose comments. Zetana (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Of course, no problem. Let me know when you've finished expanding the article, and I can leave more detailed feedback to help refine the prose. Zetana (talk) 02:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Query from Z1720
editHi @Vacant0:, are you still looking for comments for this PR? If so, I suggest posting a request for review on the Wikiprojects that this article is attached to. If you think this article is ready for GAN, please close this PR and nominate the article for WP:GAN. Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi! I did nominate it for GA but I forgot to close this peer review, I'll do that now. --Vacant0 (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)