This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is a new article and I would like some feedback on the work I have put into it. If feedback is positive, I plan to submit it for Wikipedia:FLC.
I would prefare NOT to have an automated review please.
Thanks, Jamie jca (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- It looks good, but it needs to be checked for grammatical errors. I found a few. The ratings section goes into too much detail. I recommend that you only cover the premiere, finale, low, high (if different from premiere), timeslot change and average. Also, edit the references' titles, i.e. not all caps. –thedemonhog talk • edits 03:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Done -- Jamie jca (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
