Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has already achieved GA status, but failed its first attempt to reach FA status back in February. I'd really appreciate it if someone could have a look through the prose, and see if there are any superfluous words that could be removed to improve the page, so that it can then go on to FA status.
Thanks, Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)