| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… this article can go for GA and will need improvement.
Thanks, Ayanosh (talk) 07:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Short comment: A detailed peer review is very premature at this stage; the article is barely started, beyond the plot summary. I suggest you go to WP:GA and check out some of the existing GA literature articles. In particular, look at the kinds of section that need to be written: Creation, Publishing history, Characters, Critical reception, etc. The object of Peer review is not to get articles written, but to provide a critical assessment of work in the later stages of its development. There is not enough here, yet. Brianboulton (talk) 23:42, 8 August 2012 (UTC)