Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it is presently a B-class and I'm looking to get it to GA and eventually FA. Any suggestions on how to improve the prose would be ideal.
Thanks, Rfl0216 (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Rfl0216 article looks good and like it has a reasonable chance of passing WP:GA, the only thing I'd note is that the lead should probably be one or two paragraphs longer to better summarise the article's text. Good luck at GA!
This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck!