Is it clear? What is missing? David.Monniaux 08:39, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Clear? It's a beautiful piece of legal writing and will make a fine feature article. I don't really see anything to change. This is the sort of thing that motivates me to work more on my own legal articles . . . here and else-where. Good job.--Mike 00:52, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed there were many bulleted lists. Do you think it's a problem? David.Monniaux 08:33, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


  • No. These lists do not bother me. Again, I think it's very nicely done. My only concern is that the topic is broad enough in appeal to merit being a feature article. Will non-lawyers want to read about this?--Mike 06:42, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]