| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I would one day like to see it become an FA. I have worked for almost three years on this article, raising it from the rather sad state it was originally in. I've combed through it, looking for weird prose, and it's been copy-edited, but I would love for someone to peer-review it.
Thanks, Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comments from Calvin999
- One Dab Link
- For the opening and ending theme parameters, do they need to be in small text? It's a bit difficult to read.
- You have External links at the bottom of the article so I don't really see the need to include another section of the same thing in the Info box which only makes it unnecessarily longer.
- , a human boy, → Do you need to say "human"?
- Along the way, → Where? What?
- picked it up → I think this sounds to informal for a prospective FAC.
- records their → I would have thought records should be singular here.
- guest actors and actresses → Use either 'actors' or 'guest stars'. Actors and actresses sounds a bit long winded as it it's same thing but just for male and female
- (which will debut on November 2 → Year?
- is also in the works. → As before, this sounds a bit informal.
- has developed a strong following among teenagers and adults. → So it's not for children? I thought it was until now.
- Why do you link dog in Premise but not the lead? I don't think dog needs to be linked really.
- time attending California Institute of the Arts → I feel like 'the' should be placed in between 'attending California'
- single stand-alone → Same difference. Just use one.
- the studio's rights to pick up the show expired, → This reads slightly awkward, to me at least.
- decided to shop it → Too informal. Pitch?
- , and, that by → Shouldn't it be: , and that, by
- Many of the series' artists have backgrounds in indie comics. → This is sourced at the end of the following sentence, but really it should be at the end of this sentence, too.
- Mike LeChevallier of Slate magazine, → You don't need to write 'magazine'
- The quote box in Critical reviews doesn't need quotation marks in it, because it's already signified as such by being a stand alone quote box. And who is D.F.?
- Why do refineries such as 31, 32 and 35 have [ ] in the tiles?
- I did some spot-checks, and ref 27 clearly needs a login or subscription. This should be noted in the citation.
I hope these prove useful to you. Please ping me if you have any questions. — Calvin999 18:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you! These were very helpful!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)