This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to take it to FAC at some point, but it probably is full of jargon and needs some copyediting.
Thanks, Ealdgyth - Talk 19:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
Hah, we meet again!
- Not keen that the infobox has his Birth name as Ealdred while most of the article uses Aldred.
- If you link English you probably ought to link ecclesiastic in the opening sentence...
- Link King of England rather than "king of England".
- Image sizes ought to comply with WP:MOS#Images so portrait images should use the
uprightmodifier, for example. - "The Handbook of British Chronology Third Edition says ..." - not keen on a handbook saying something...
- "Bishop of Hereford" or "bishop of Hereford"?
- Order citations numerically - [9][3] for example. And [28][3]
- "Aldred in 1046 led an unsuccessful ...", probably better to say that "In 1046, Aldred..."
- "moving of the see of Crediton to Exeter," jargon warning!
- "post-Conquest" - which conquest?
- I think Pope Nick's caption is a complete sentence? Thus a full stop/period is required.
- "Travelled" in Brit Eng, not a single l.
- Pages in references (if more than one) should use pp and (as you and your scripts know all too well) use the en-dash!
That's a good start. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)