| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I first took this article through a GAN a little less than a year ago, and took another look at it recently, pleasantly surprised to find that it was about as good as I'd remembered. It is something I wouldn't mind taking to FAC in the future, but I imagine there is still work to be done. If anyone has any input on anything at all — overall structure, specific prose issues, referencing, or anything else, I would love to hear about it. Thanks in advance for your time! Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 04:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC)