Wikipedia's Peer review process exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors, and is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work, often as a way of preparing a featured article candidate. It is not academic peer review by a group of experts in a particular subject, and articles that undergo this process should not be assumed to have greater authority than any other. For general editing advice, see Wikipedia style guidelines, Wikipedia how-to, "How to write a great article", and "The perfect article". Articles that need extensive basic editing should be directed to Pages needing attention, Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment. |
The path to a featured article |
The following peer review suggestions were semi-automatically generated by a javascript code - they may or possibly may not be accurate/applicable for the article in question due to unique differences for each articles. They are provided as a supplement to manual suggestions, and generally focus on stylistic issues that peer reviewers may miss or not be aware of. Creation procedure How to respond to a request How to remove a request How to get updated suggestions Notes |
- For information regarding the peer reviewing script, please see User:AndyZ/peerreviewer.
Requests
edit2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 |
Archives can be found on the template to the right.
Note: As of July 31, 2009, the semi-automated peer reviews are available here and User: Ruhrfisch has stopped doing the semi-automated peer reviews as User:AZPR.