I've made a few addtions and changes to this page over the last few weeks, but I'm still new to this and I'm starting to get a bit cross-eyed with the overall picture that the article paints, would appreciate any comments from detached editors on general areas that still need significant work and any suggested improvements. Mighty Antar 23:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Automated review
editThe following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article. [?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 2 miles, use 2 miles, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 2 miles.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.[?]
*When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DrKiernan 08:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)