Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I plan to get it to Good Article.
Thanks, TwoScars (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Comments by Dudley
edit- "An outnumbered Union cavalry division". It is a matter of personal taste, but I think it would make it easier to follow if you left out "outnumbered" here and give details in the next paragraph.
- "detachment of a brigade of cavalry, belonging to Brigadier General William E. "Grumble" Jones". "belonging to" sounds odd to me, as if they were his slaves.
- "totaling to about 400" to about sounds strange to me. Is it AmerEng?
- "captured one company from the 8th Virginia Cavalry" You mean that an entire company surrendered? How many men?
- "Historian Robert C. Whisonant wrote that Confederate casualties were 40.[33] Robert Underwood Johnson and Clarence Buel wrote that Confederate casualties were "fifty or sixty".[22] The historian for Morgan's Cavalry, Confederate Brigadier General Basil W. Duke, wrote that casualties were "about fifty". I am not sure that you need that much detail about the different estimates. Maybe just say 40 to 60?
- "by a ruse on a telegraph" Details of the ruse would be interesting.
- "Major General Philip Sheridan requested his dismissal from the service." Maybe state whether he was dismissed.
- This article looks sound. Apart from the minor queries above, I would have like more spelling out of the comparative sizes of the forces in each encounter or other situation - e.g "He also learned that 4,500 Confederate troops led by John Hunt Morgan and William "Grumble" Jones were waiting for him at Saltville." Instead of "waiting for him", "waiting for his [number] troops". Dudley Miles (talk) 13:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)