This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because even though this show was short-lived, I believe it might be at least on its way to being a good article. If no more than to keep articles to a certain quality.
Thanks, Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
edit- Expand the lead per WP:LEAD to at least two weighty paragraphs.
- "officially greenlit and given a thirteen-episode order " - very jargony.
- "It is aired on Thursday nights on 10:02PM Eastern/9:02PM Central" - was aired I guess now. Plus check the time formats against Wikipedia:DATE#Times
- Thursday repeated, no need for the second one.
- Move references per WP:CITE to get them immediately after punctuation where applicable.
- "effective October 25th" - check the date format vs WP:DATE.
- "Despite the order of thirteen episodes," - confusing, could be discussing the chronological order...
- Plot needs expansion, considerably. A plain quote is insufficient.
- Axe the "Mr. x", and stick with plain old "x" - this is an encyclopaedia.
- 18-49 needs an en-dash instead of a hyphen.
- What's the point in a timeslot column when you've already said when every show was broadcast (i.e. thursday nights 10.02pm).
- Season needs en-dash to separate, not hyphen.
- Explain what Rating and Share mean.
- Why was one of the ranks N/A?
- Don't use in-line citations like " http://www.zap2it.com/tv/ratings/" - use proper references.
- Expand references to use {{Cite web}} with all its lovely benefits.
That should help a bit to improve to the article. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)