I've listed this article for peer review because significant work has been done in the article over the last view weeks and I think it has been significantly improved (see [1] for what it was like before). I'd like to get feedback on other potential improvements to be made and to see if it is ready to go from Start to B class as part of the over all goal of GA or Featured status later.
Thanks,
Collectonian (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 01:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Review
editIdeas if you go for GA.
- Include the manga, light novels, and video games in the infobox.
- Genres should be alphabetized
- If possible, find an image of just the logo to put in the infobox.
- Make sure the lead section conform with guidelines at WP:Lead.
- Article needs a reception section.
- A slimmed down version of the major characters should be added to the character section of the main article.
- Add a subsection in the character section named "Character types".
- Found 9 red links. Consider making stubs for them or removing the link.
- Some words used in the article are in the guideline Words to avoid.
(Duane543 (talk) 16:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC))
- Thanks! Will work on those items. Collectonian (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)