Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to see how ready it is to be nominated for featured article status
Thanks, Christian (talk) 20:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. And, since you are still seeking your first successful FAC, I suggest seeking a FA mentor and start reviewing FACs now to build goodwill among the FAC regulars. Z1720 (talk) 16:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
@Chrishm21: This has been open for over a month without comments. Are you still interested in receiving feedback? If not, can this be closed? Z1720 (talk) 00:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm still interested in (any) feedback, as I wish to nominate it for FA. Christian (talk) 22:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- I suggest that you ask for reviews on the Wikiprojects attached to this article and perhaps from experienced editors who have passed similar articles through WP:FAC. I also suggest that you review FACs if you haven't done so already so that you can build goodwill amongst the FAC community. Z1720 (talk) 03:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Chrishm21: It has been another month, and still no comments. Are you still interested in comments? Have you reached out to any editors to ask for comments? Z1720 (talk) 00:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- I suggest that you ask for reviews on the Wikiprojects attached to this article and perhaps from experienced editors who have passed similar articles through WP:FAC. I also suggest that you review FACs if you haven't done so already so that you can build goodwill amongst the FAC community. Z1720 (talk) 03:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)