Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I noticed it has no rating on the quality scale. After viewing it for some time, I suggest that it should be eligible for C-class.
Thanks, Dunkleosteus77 (push to talk) 00:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Just do it, no need for a peer review. It's start or C, but PR is for article improvements not to discuss assessment. Montanabw(talk) 23:30, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- I wish I knew that earlier... Dunkleosteus77 (push to talk) 19:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Discussion closed I guess. Does this still count on my one peer review nomination per editor? Dunkleosteus77 (push to talk) 04:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- I wish I knew that earlier... Dunkleosteus77 (push to talk) 19:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- If you close it, then you can have another one! Montanabw(talk) 07:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)